Submit your comments on this article | ||
Home Front: WoT | ||
Obama on terror trials: KSM will die | ||
2009-11-18 | ||
During a round of network television interviews conducted during Obama’s visit to China, the president was asked about those who find it offensive that Mohammed will receive all the rights normally accorded to U.S. citizens when they are charged with a crime. “I don't think it will be offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him,” Obama told NBC’s Chuck Todd. When Todd asked Obama if he was interfering in the trial process by declaring that Mohammed will be executed, Obama, a former constitutional law professor, insisted that he wasn’t trying to dictate the result. “What I said was, people will not be offended if that's the outcome. I'm not pre-judging, I'm not going to be in that courtroom, that's the job of prosecutors, the judge and the jury,” Obama said. “What I'm absolutely clear about is that I have complete confidence in the American people and our legal traditions and the prosecutors, the tough prosecutors from New York who specialize in terrorism.” In another interview, Obama said he had not tried to tell Attorney General Eric Holder whether the case involving KSM and four other alleged 9/11 plotters should be heard in federal court or before a military tribunal. “I said to the attorney general, make a decision based on the law,” the president told CNN’s Ed Henry. “We have set up now a military commission system that is greatly reformed and so we can try terrorists in the forum. But I also have great confidence in our Article 3 courts, the courts that have tried hundreds of terrorist suspects who are imprisoned right now in the United States.” Obama also suggested that critics of the decision are unwisely building the alleged Al Qaeda operatives into larger-than-life figures who require the U.S. to abandon its usual legal processes. “I think this notion that somehow we have to be fearful, that these terrorists are –possess some special powers that prevent us from presenting evidence against them, locking them up and, you know, exacting swift justice, I think that has been a fundamental mistake,” the president declared.
| ||
Posted by: |
#11 Where he will be convicted and sentenced to time served, Pappy? |
Posted by: trailing wife 2009-11-18 22:49 |
#10 Nixon made a mistake when he opined that Charles Manson was guilty. This is about ten times worse. Prediction: KSM gets acquitted on a technicality and then deported to Pakistan to 'face charges'. |
Posted by: Pappy 2009-11-18 22:32 |
#9 O stepped in it this time. The cop in Cambridge was little league. Now he gave the defense a big a$$ed gift. |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2009-11-18 21:30 |
#8 What is Obama doing, why did he block that and why is he going with the most stupid and dragged out way he could have done this? That's a rhetorical question, right? |
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007 2009-11-18 20:14 |
#7 If the President of the United States, formally the most powerful man in the world, declares that "New York will feel better about it when heÂ’s put to death" how can KSM possibly get a fair trial in New York City, much less anywhere in the world? Else, what is the point of the trial? |
Posted by: Kelly 2009-11-18 19:47 |
#6 Its not law enforcement, this is a military matter. Damned scumbag lawyers Obama and Holder. There go our civil liberties, destroyed by the precedents this case will set by forcing military tribunal techniques into the criminal courts. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed pleaded guilty eleven months ago and asked for the death penalty at his tribunal. Why did they not accept it and get it over with? What is Obama doing, why did he block that and why is he going with the most stupid and dragged out way he could have done this? |
Posted by: Jeager Panda5130 2009-11-18 19:22 |
#5 And, because someone has to say it: Just imagine if Bush had done that. |
Posted by: Angie Schultz 2009-11-18 18:03 |
#4 I am not a lawyer, but I've watched a lot of TV shows about courts, and I read overlawyered.com. Seems to me that a good defense lawyer could get the whole case thrown out on Obama's statements alone. How can a jury render an impartial decision when the President of the United States has said that KSM is guilty, and that he will be executed! Talk about influencing the jury pool! |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2009-11-18 17:20 |
#3 I didn't vote for the man, but I wanted him to work out. He's becoming a parody of a bad president. |
Posted by: Mizzou Mafia 2009-11-18 16:55 |
#2 Its a good thing that since the war on terror is now the prosecution for initiators of man made disasters that there is lawyer in the White House, a constitutional lawyer at that, because if lawfare is going to be the new course than it just makes sense...wait what'd he say? Dammit. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2009-11-18 15:36 |
#1 I think we already concluded---from the actions of the AG that he's appointed, what respect Obama has for your legal system. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2009-11-18 14:40 |