You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
White House Dismisses 'Climategate' Because 'Most People' Believe in Global Warming
2009-12-02
(CNSNews.com) - As President Barack Obama prepares to travel to a global climate summit next week in Copenhagen, the White House is dismissing the "climategate" controversy that has arisen over the leak of email communications between top climate-change scientists that some skeptics say cast doubt on the legitimacy of the science behind the theory that human activity is causing global warming.

Obama will be attending the United Nations Climate Change Conference on Dec. 9. The conference in Copenhagen comes soon after the emails released by a computer hacker has led one Republican U.S. senator to call for an investigtation.

Some global warming skeptics have referred to the e-mails--from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit in England--as "climategate."

But White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs dismissed the controversy on Monday, saying that most people don't dispute global warming.

"In the order of several thousand scientists have come to the conclusion that climate change is happening," Gibbs said. "I don't think that any of that is, quite frankly among most people, in dispute."

Leading global-warming skeptic Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, wants an investigation into the content of the e-mails. He has asked all government agencies to retain e-mails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit.

"It appears that, in an attempt to conceal the manipulation of climate data, information disclosure laws may have been violated," Inhofe said in a statement last week. "I certainly don't condone the manner in which these emails were released; however, now that they are in the public domain, lawmakers have an obligation to determine the extent to which the so-called 'consensus' of global warming, formed with billions of taxpayer dollars, was contrived in the biased minds of the world's leading climate scientists."
Posted by:Fred

#14  'Most people' will still consider Pluto a planet, even though it is approximately a fifth the mass of the Earth's Moon and a third its volume, not based on cold science, but on cultural habit.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-12-02 22:58  

#13  I seem to remember a law passed by Congress that rules and regulations had to be based on "hard science". Now we see that the "science" of anthropogenic climate change is a mixture of hype and huxterism, with virtually NO real science. The EPA and the White House should read the NIPCC report, and the fact that 31,000 scientists, including more than 9000 PhDs, signed a letter to Congress repudiating "AGW". Someone needs to whap Gibbs upside the head with a cluebat. Probably wouldn't hurt to use the same one on "president" Obumble.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-12-02 21:10  

#12  Â“The great tragedy of Science – the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.”
Thomas H. Huxley
Posted by: tipper   2009-12-02 19:37  

#11  Yes, Darth. That was a scientific consensus.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2009-12-02 13:31  

#10  Most people belived the sun revolved around the Earth too. Didn't mean they were right.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-12-02 12:45  

#9  Climate change IS happening. Always has happened. Always will happen. Climate is nothing but long-term weather, right? And as the saying goes in a lot of places "Don't like the weather? Wait a few minutes and it'll change."
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-12-02 12:44  

#8  But White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs dismissed the controversy on Monday, saying that most people don't dispute global warming.

"In the order of several thousand scientists have come to the conclusion that climate change is happening," Gibbs said. "I don't think that any of that is, quite frankly among most people, in dispute."

Well now which is it? What the hell does climate change mean anyway? Glaciers caused the high plains, but there are no glaciers there any more... should I worry about that?

Someone please tell me what the ideal average temperature of the Earth ought to be anyway. Or how much rainfall we ought to get.
Posted by: Fletch Platypus8360   2009-12-02 10:40  

#7  The Senate rejected Kyoto, once upon a time.

Clinton never sent it to the Senate for ratification. The Senate sent him a message, Byrd-Hagel Resolution, passed 95-0, not to even bother. [It's dead Jim]
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-12-02 08:40  

#6  Aren't you glad Obama took the politics out of science?
Posted by: DMFD   2009-12-02 08:12  

#5  See! It is a religion!
They profess belief!
Posted by: 3dc   2009-12-02 06:31  

#4  Quite right. Harry Reid is too busy with pending "health care" legislation to be concerned about Copenhagen.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-12-02 05:11  

#3  Nothing President Obama signs in Copenhagen is binding upon the U.S. until the Senate votes for it. The Senate rejected Kyoto, once upon a time.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-12-02 05:07  

#2  We're doing science by poll now?

Twits.
Posted by: mojo   2009-12-02 01:27  

#1  pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. The believers are so close they are just hoping to brass it out and do what they want to do before the chance passes. Too bad this stuff wasn't leaked a year ago.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-12-02 00:28  

00:00