You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Forced surrender in 1971
2009-12-16
By TARIQ MAJEED

The political chaos in 1971 culminating in secession of Pakistan's Eastern Wing was the result of a plan executed jointly by USA, Israel, Britain, India and former Soviet Union. Its mastermind was the Zionist International Jewry that controls the power centres in these countries through its entrenched lobbies.
I s'pose it's more comfortable to think one was defeated by those so much cleverer that success was impossible, but it seems to me that would lead to the idea that success would never become possible so long as the clever ones are still around. But clearly our writer and his fellow Pakistanis are too stupid to realize that.
The plan could not have succeeded without the active participation of a treacherous gang of some civil and military leaders within Pakistan.
Because even Pakistani stupidity isn't quite stupid enough without some of its cleverer members helping the clever ones. Got it.
East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, may still one day rejoin with the parent country.
Why? Given how many y'all killed and raped in 1971, and the latest incident, non-stupid people would assume that the best Pakistan would ever get from Bangladesh is being ignored. Less good would be active plotting to destroy Pakistan.
People in both the wings are ready to forgive and forget.
Really? Who, exactly, besides the bunch involved in the recent incident, pretty much all of whom are hoping their livers don't succumb to cirrhosis before they go to trial.
No one doubts that they were made the victims of an international conspiracy that included the services of several local agents. The Muslim of Bangladesh have realised that they were misled by design into looking upon Indians as their friends and West Pakistanis as enemies.
How I miss fans as a fashion accessory. They were so useful in covering what could be received as insulting expressions.
But the military surrender was devastating and beyond imagination.
Pakistani imagination at least, which has been so often demonstrated as limited, poor dears.
The humiliation and the anger felt by the masses, and more so by the soldiers, who had been cheated by their top commanders, lingers in their minds.

Although there is plenty of literature on the 1971 crisis, yet several devious schemes that nurtured the crisis and shaped its outcome are still to be exposed. Moreover, the writings of some Americans on the 1971 episode are a rich source of revelations about many of the otherwise less known occurrences. When this material is analysed it exposes USA' hand in fomenting rebellion by the Awami League, assisting India in deploying the Mukti Bahni terrorists, provoking the war and devising a quick defeat for Pakistan.
For a given reading of the source material. Much like Professor Mann's hockey stick program, which produces the same graph regardless of the data input.
It is most depressing to find how Pakistan's top leaders were duped into accepting the idea of a military surrender although Indians were not expected it. Indian Army's Maj Gen Sukhwant Singh in his book wrote: "...most of the Pakistani units were up to operational strength and had a considerable potential to continue the war, if Gen Niazi had not accepted such an early ceasefire." Indeed, in spite of all the handicaps, Pakistan forces could have fought on for several weeks. So what caused the surrender?
Possibly because they would have lost in the end anyway, but with the Pakistani forces significantly understrength by that point?
The surrender was brought about by the US with masterful machinations, involving local agents in Pakistan and India and manipulation of the pliant persons who had been placed in key positions in Islamabad and Dhaka. The master stroke was the highly deceptive dispatch of the US naval forces to the Bay of Bengal.
I imagine the dispatch was not deceptive in the least, which is why the Pakistani generals actually got the message.
The dramatic deployment of the US warships performed the pivotal role in the grand manoeuvre of deception and psychological warfare targeting the Pakistani leaders. Admiral Elmo R Zumwalt, Chief of Naval Operations of the US Navy in 197I, in On Watch: A Memoir wrote: "On Dec 10, a presidential order, that was not discussed with the Navy in advance, created Task Group (TG) 74, consisting of the nuclear carrier Enterprise and appropriate escorts, and sent it steaming from the Gulf of Tonkin to Singapore. The order did not specify what TG 74's mission was....The ships were held off Singapore for two days. On Dec 12 they were ordered through the Straits of Malacca into the Indian Ocean. Within an hour that order was rescinded! Next day it was reissued. At the same time, 'sources' in Washington let it be known that the object of the exercise was covering the evacuation of American civilians from Dhaka. This clearly was a cover story since that evacuation was successfully completed two days before TG 74 entered the Indian Ocean....On Jan 08 it was ordered out of the Indian Ocean as mysteriously as it had been ordered in. I still do not know exactly what to think of the TG 74 episode."

Zumwalt is right. Not even President Nixon knew what was TG 74's mission. Originally, the mission was a Zionist secret known only to Kissinger and his schemers from the CIA and Mossad. It was controlled from the White House, in other words, by Kissinger, who was the national security advisor to the president.
Really, given the resources available to your enemy, why do you keep so futilly striving?
The Naval Task Force was used as a lethal instrument for a psychological blow. It was to flash a signal of support to the dispirited leaders in Pakistan, who were facing a desperate situation in the war, so as to boost their morale with the hope that US military help had arrived after all; and then at a set time cancel the signal abruptly, causing in Pakistan's military leaders a sudden and complete collapse of morale rendering them incapable of resistance to the offer of ceasefire with surrender. This was exactly what happened.
Why on earth would they assume America planned to intervene on their side in an unnecessary and ugly war they started?

The writer is a retired commodore, Pakistan Navy.
No wonder Pakistan never wins.
Posted by:john frum

#15  I was just translating, Dr. Steve. I'm not clever enough to think of such things all on my ownsome.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-12-16 18:51  

#14  Because even Pakistani stupidity isn't quite stupid enough without some of its cleverer members helping the clever ones.

By Gawd, that's a quote we need to enshrine around here.
Posted by: Steve White   2009-12-16 15:46  

#13  USA, Israel, Britain, India and former Soviet Union

(a) It wasn't former in 71.
(b) "Why bicycle riders?"
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-12-16 15:13  

#12  I would rather read the tripping writer than Tariq Majeed. say Dr. Seuss
Posted by: chris   2009-12-16 13:59  

#11  If you dropped LSD on a writer you couldn't get a more imagined piece then Tawriq's pen has brought forth.
Posted by: 3dc   2009-12-16 12:16  

#10  All that talk of wings brings to mind the image of a bug being squashed. Happy thought...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2009-12-16 11:23  

#9  Yeah the Soviet Union was helping out the Americans to screw Pakistan on behalf of Israel. That is a twisted little circle they've created. Much smarter if they had blamed an Indian/Burmese secret deal because Burma is in the proximity of East Pakistan and the government of Burma disappeared into the swamps of Myanmar making it impossible to truly prove conspiracy was made up.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-12-16 11:01  

#8  Echoing femto violins.
Posted by: Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division   2009-12-16 10:48  

#7  Hmmm,this is sort of like blaming the swiss for Dunkirque.
Posted by: Karl Rove   2009-12-16 10:31  

#6  funny how these guys get all riled up years after they're defeated in whatever war, (choose war here) and then try to explain away their own incompetence and subsequent military loss as being the inevitable outcome of conspiratorial forces beyond their control. I guess they need a new lesson in the old adage "live by the sword, die by the sword.
Posted by: 746   2009-12-16 10:01  

#5  Those evil JOOOOOS struck again.
Posted by: Black Bart Ebberens7700   2009-12-16 08:44  

#4  retired Commodore, ya say? He besmirches that fine title
Posted by: Frank G   2009-12-16 08:31  

#3  Scooter nailed it.
(BTW, Israel is controlled by Zionist International Jewry? Nothing gets by these guys.)
Posted by: Spot   2009-12-16 08:31  

#2  It's this brand of insanity that ensures Pakistan will remain one of the first-class shitholes on our planet for generations to come.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2009-12-16 07:56  

#1  
Posted by: john frum   2009-12-16 06:44  

00:00