You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Putin threatens new missiles to counter U.S. shield
2009-12-30
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin warned Tuesday that Russia will have to go ahead with a new class of advanced offensive nuclear missiles if the United States continues with plans to develop a defensive missile shield.

The powerful ex-president said in Vladivostok that the dispute was the main issue holding up negotiations on a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). Those tensions could be eased if Washington provides Moscow with full details of the missile shield plan, Mr. Putin added. He said Russia would reciprocate with information about its offensive missiles.
We should hope that Putin carries through with his threat. Every ruble he spends on new strategic missiles is a ruble unavailable to modernize the conventional forces which are in desperate need of new equipment, better training and better pay. The Bulava missile in particular has been one of the most expensive strategic turkeys in history. We can afford strategic defense, Russia can't afford strategic offense.
Russia analysts said the remarks appeared to be an effort by Mr. Putin to squeeze as many concessions as possible from the Obama administration before agreeing to a new treaty to replace an arms reduction pact that expired Dec. 5.

"It's a negotiating ploy," said Clifford Kupchan, a Russia specialist at the Eurasia Group, a risk analysis and consulting firm. "Both sides want a START treaty, but Putin wants at least informal constraints even around Obama's missile defense lite."
Hoping to chain down President Palin (or Pawlenty) in 2013 is more like it ...
Earlier this year, the Obama administration scrapped plans by the George W. Bush administration to base interceptors and radar in the Czech Republic and Poland in favor of a largely sea-based program.

Nevertheless, Mr. Kupchan said, Russia remains "in perpetuity scared of a potential U.S. ability to neutralize their second strike capability."

A former U.S. intercontinental ballistic missile officer and current Defense Department official told The Washington Times that Mr. Putin is "trying to get us to drop as many missile defense systems as we will drop. He is going to push until he finds that line where we say, 'No more.' "
You may not find that day while Bambi is around ...
Mr. Putin, who is widely considered to be more powerful than Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, appeared to deliberately link U.S. missile defense plans to the treaty aimed at reducing U.S. and Russian stockpiles of offensive nuclear weapons.

"If we want to retain the balance, we have to establish an exchange of information: Let the U.S. partners provide us information on [their] missile defense while we will give them information on [our] offensive weapons," Mr. Putin said.

A U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the delicate state of negotiations told The Times, "We are aware of Putin's comments. The bottom line is that as the president said alongside President Medvedev in Copenhagen, we continue to work on the START treaty."

Indeed, Mr. Medvedev said in Copenhagen on Dec. 18, "Our positions are very close and almost all the issues that we've been discussing for the last month are almost closed. And there are certain technical details which we can encounter, many agreements which require further work. I hope that we will be able to do it in a quite brief period of time."

The Obama administration -- like its predecessor -- has insisted that missile defense is aimed not at Russia but at Iran and North Korea. Its decision to scrap the Bush plan, however, was seen by many as a concession to Russia and part of an effort to "reset" relations and improve cooperation on other issues, including Iran.
That worked well ...
Toby Gati, who was a special assistant for Russia to President Clinton and is a former assistant secretary of state for intelligence and research, said the Russians "always regard their missile forces as the one element of their national defense which is the absolute equivalent of U.S. systems and gives them the stature of a great power on par with the United States in this area. They jealously guard any action which might undermine it."

Mrs. Gati said the Putin remarks could reflect Russian concern that the U.S. decision not to base a missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland did not eliminate plans for the system altogether.

"The Russians have always been concerned about our defensive systems, and their original satisfaction that we backed away from the plan in Central Europe is now over," she said. "Now they are facing the realities of what that new system is and the fact that the U.S. continues and will continue to have systems that they regard as a threat, even if these systems are not a threat."
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Putin threatens new missiles to counter U.S. shield


excellent headline. double deep.

Posted by: Mike Hunt   2009-12-30 20:57  

#6  Interceptors are a heck of a lot cheaper than ICBMs, and even after the $787b stimulus we've got more money than you. Bring it on, Pooty.
Posted by: Mike   2009-12-30 14:01  

#5  If Putin wants to be like that then lets get back to work on those missile defense shields.
Posted by: Indian Giver   2009-12-30 13:04  

#4  How much would the mullahs pay Puttie to put roadblocks in front of the defense shield aimed at them? Is that too cynical a question?
Posted by: AlanC   2009-12-30 10:25  

#3  I think Putin is trying to make lemonade out of the Bulava lemons. They need a new class of missile anyway, but the Duma doesn't want to pay for it, so Putin is trying to pretend that Russia is threatened to squeeze the money out of them.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-12-30 09:10  

#2  "The Russians have always been concerned about our defensive systems,

But not so much their own defensive systems which they can sell to Iran to counter a threat from the US ir IS.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-12-30 07:36  

#1  Our defensive systems aren't designed to defend against a massive attack from a country such as Russia. They are designed to defend against smaller attack.

If Russia is worried about this, it says to me that they must have a strategy of limited nuclear war that such a defensive system would interfere with. It would potentially eliminate the ability or Russia to intimidate by threatening to launch a small number of nukes and force them to go "big" quickly.

It stinks. Force them to go big or keep them on the launcher. I am not in favor of anything that allows Russia or anyone else to play an intimidation game with the threat of a small strike.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-12-30 03:47  

00:00