You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Liberals tune out Mass. message
2010-01-27
My favorite e-mail after Scott Brown's stunning Senate victory: "Can You Hear Us NOW?"
"Say whut?"
Answer from Team Obama: "We Know - You Love Us!"
"Just ignore those guys in the voting booth! Those people are crazy!"
There's a point where blind arrogance becomes comic, and we passed the punch line long ago.
The danger for the good guys now is becoming over-confident. The machine is still intact, Soros still has lotsa money, and there are lots of little ACORNs out there.
Well, everybody showed up here. The SEIU, DSCC, MoveOn, the unions, Barry, and the usual local suspects. And it hurt them more then helped them. Mainly because Brown ignored them all and just stayed on his message.
Check out this headline from the Boston Globe-Democrat: "The Message: Loud But Not So Clear."
Not if you're looking on from Uranus...
Latest Globe poll sez Coakley up by 25...
Not clear to whom? Bad policies and even worse politics drove this blue state to replace Ted Kennedy with a fiscally-conservative Republican. It wasn't exactly a subtle message.
A poke in the eye with a sharp stick is more subtle...
And yet it's still lost on folks like Globie Renee Loth, still defending the liberal status quo. Loth blamed Democrat Martha Coakley's once-unthinkable defeat on the poor quality of our voters.
"Buncha dumbasses. What were they thinking?"
"Brown didn't run a hate campaign," Loth conceded, "but he did become the locus for a broad variety of resentments, from people angry over the state's sales tax increase to changes in their health care to gay rights."
Yasss... I can remember how the crowds whooped when Brown released his gay rights manifesto...
"Gay rights?" You see any Brown ads about gay rights?
He didn't? Really? After having had his nekkid picture in a magazine read almost exclusively by gay men?
No. But everybody here remembers that the great unwashed were not considered "enlightened" enough to be allowed to vote on gay marriage by the powers that be up here. They know what's best for us and have no qualms about reminding us of that. Which is a big part of why he won.
Doesn't matter. Liberals can read between the lines: "Brown's campaign unmistakably appealed to men, even beyond the obvious contrast with Coakley.
The fact that he never persecuted any of the Amiraults?
"The truck, the barn jacket, the sports figures giving endorsements all signaled that Brown's campaign was a comfortable home for disaffected men.
... and the wimmin who love them...
"Even his victory party had the look and feel of a beer-fueled tailgate party," Loth wrote.
Looked like your standard-issue election night victory (the word rolls off the tongue!) party, except that his daughter was doing the singing. Oh, and when they immolated James Carville. I guess that wasn't standard...
Sorry there was no cross burning, Renee, Somebody musta forgot the lighter fluid...
My colleague Margery Eagan made the same point on CNN, claiming Brown's win was a victory for the "Gillette Stadium" crowd.
I'll pass on the "Gillette Stadium" jibe, not being familiar with Boston...
That's okay. We don't know either. Madgey the Man Hater musta made it up on her own.
Who knew that the key electorate here was beer-swilling, truck-loving, testosterone-addled, homophobic white men? This from a state that elected Deval Patrick governor and, just a year ago, gave Barack Obama a 26-point win!
"Yeah, but that was different."
"How wuz it different?"
"I don't wanna talk about it."

Wow - what are they putting in that beer, anyway?
Grits?
This "logic" may be laughable, but it makes perfect sense to the liberal elites. "Mobs Rule" was the headline for New York Times [NYT] columnist Charles Blow. "Welcome to the mob: an angry, wounded electorate, riled by recession, careening across the political spectrum, still craving change, nursing a bloodlust."
Well, actually, that's pretty true. We the People elected B.O. feeling all hopey-changey and we've watched a year-long parade of condescension, arrogance, boodling, and bed-wetting, which leaves us in worse shape today than when he took office. So the voters of Taxachussetts were supposed to vote for more of the same hopey change?
These ignorant voters who are "too easily manipulated" acted in irrational anger, Blow insists. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that Team Obama's first year in office has been a stumbling, inept and expensive mess.
That's what I said...
They'll never get it. Or, by the time they do, it'll be too late for them. Which is fine by me...
Posted by:Fred

#12  I expect I could get a decent Torta or Machaca Burrito there now
Posted by: Frank G   2010-01-27 19:06  

#11  When I was living in Woburn, Massachusetts back in 1991/92 there was a small eatery named Betty's Breakfast Kitchen. I was sitting at the bar one Saturday morning and the waitress asked if I wanted my usual. I asked if they possibly had grits. She said, "Yes. Betty's ex is from Alabama and we have grits". She served me and an eldery black gentleman sat down next to me and did a double-take. He asked, "Is does grits?" I said they certainly are! He yelled, "Betty! You didn't tell me you has grits!" We had a very pleasant breakfast and conversation. He was from Georgia.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2010-01-27 19:02  

#10  If the donks are too stupid unaware to get their heads out of the sand, that is just fine.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-01-27 15:04  

#9  This nails it:

"The contest between the Nuts and the Creeps may be ending. The Nuts just got handed three big losses, and will have to have a meeting in Washington to discuss whether they've gotten too nutty. But the Creeps have kind of had their meetings—in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts. And what seems to be emerging from that is a new and nonsnarling Republicanism. It may be true—and they will demonstrate in time if it is true—that they have learned from past defeats, absorbed the lessons, reconsidered the meaning of politics. Maybe in time it will be said of this generation of Republicans what André Malraux said to Whittaker Chambers after reading his memoir, "Witness": "You did not come back from hell with empty hands."

For Mr. Brown now, everything depends on execution. He made the Olympics. Now he has to do the swan dive, with a billion people watching. And then he has to do it again.

He needs to serve the country the way he campaigned for votes—earnest, open, not beholden to interest or party.
Posted by: lex   2010-01-27 10:57  

#8  What Peggy said. Excerpt:

In the 2006 and 2008 elections, and at some point during the past decade, the ancestral war between Democrats and the Republicans began to take on a new look. If you were a normal human sitting at home having a beer and watching national politics peripherally, as normal people do until they focus on an election, chances are pretty good you came to see the two major parties not as the Dems versus the Reps, or the blue versus the red, but as the Nuts versus the Creeps. The Nuts were for high spending and taxing and the expansion of government no matter what. The Creeps were hypocrites who talked one thing and did another, who went along on the spending spree while lecturing on fiscal solvency.

In 2008, the voters went for Mr. Obama thinking he was not a Nut but a cool and sober moderate of the center-left sort. In 2009 and 2010, they looked at his general governing attitudes as reflected in his preoccupations—health care, cap and trade—and their hidden, potential and obvious costs, and thought, "Uh-oh, he's a Nut!"

Which meant they were left with the Creeps....
Posted by: lex   2010-01-27 10:55  

#7  I'm getting old. My mind's going. "Egg" just refused to appear...
Posted by: Fred   2010-01-27 10:11  

#6  Grits in their beer, Fred?

I know that New England is barely Unitarian on a particularly pious day, but isn't the very idea sacrilegious or something?

Now, beer in your grits might work, if you're cooking in andouille and some hot sauce ....
Posted by: lotp   2010-01-27 09:57  

#5  Gillette Stadium is the home of the New England Patriots. This "slur" fits right in with the beer drinking, racist, red-neck theme.

Which is really hilarious because the closest thing to a beer drinking red-neck we've got are college educated professionals that like sports.
Posted by: AlanC   2010-01-27 07:34  

#4  "Liberals Are F-king Retarded."
Rahm Emauel
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-01-27 05:24  

#3  Just ignore that dull ache in your side. It will go away...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2010-01-27 01:26  

#2  Sorry, but Cosmo is not a magazine read by mostly gay men. It's mostly read by college age girls trying to be all grown up and sophisticated...sort of the Sex in the City wannabes. My idiot barely old enough to buy her own beer sister-in-law never misses an issue. (Usually she needs my brother to help her with the hard, multisyllabic words, though...)

Levi Johnston was in the magazine mostly "read" by gay men called Playgirl.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-01-27 01:18  

#1  While they are stunned, move in close. Shoot him behind the ear and move on to the next one. We have three years. Reid in Nevada is potentially another casualty. There are going to be a lot of bods to bury. November should hurt the donks like bleeding hell.

Or we can let them rot in the open and leave the wanks around them to starve. Pelosi has a desperate piss soaked smell about her, even as we speak.

Its going to get very very bad ....and Obama is going to learn the hard way.

No? we have to heal the body politic and be more bi-partisan? Reach out? Extend our hand across the aisle? Yeah? You dont win a war by being fair.

remember how nice they were to George W,"Its all Bush's fault"?. Let's feed them some of their own stuff. Let's just get rid of them. Total bye-bye.
Posted by: Daffy Throatlozenge   2010-01-27 00:52  

00:00