You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Harry Reid Says GOP Should "Stop Crying" About Reconciliation
2010-02-24
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told reporters Tuesday that Republicans "should stop crying" about the possible use of the parliamentary procedure known as budget reconciliation to pass a health care reform bill.
And we expect you to act like a man when you get booted out of your office so hard that your butt ends up between your shoulder blades.
Reid said reconciliation had been used 21 times since 1981, mostly by Republicans when they were in control of the Senate for the passage of items like the Bush tax cuts.

Under reconciliation, Democrats would need a simple majority in the Senate to pass legislation, as opposed to the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster.

"They should stop crying about reconciliation as if it's never been done before," Reid said.

Following Senate Democrats' weekly luncheon, Reid said "nothing is off the table" but that "realistically, they should stop crying about this. It's been done 21 times before."

"The question is: Is reconciliation the only way we can do health-care reform?" he said. "The answer to that is no. But I've been told that my Republican friends are lamenting reconciliation, but I would recommend for them to go back and look at history."

"It's done almost every Congress, and they're the ones that used it more than anyone else," he added.

In his own press availability Tuesday, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said "it appears as if the administration has already made up their mind to go forward with a beefed up Senate version and to try to jam it through under a seldom-used process that we commonly refer to around here as reconciliation."

Republican Whip Sen. Jon Kyl told reporters that "it's hard for us to quite understand why, with reconciliation being planned, we're having a meeting [Thursday] which is allegedly designed to engender some bipartisan agreement for a way forward."

"It seems to me at least that, until the Democratic leaders take reconciliation off the table, it'll be very hard for Republicans to believe that they intend to engage us in good faith," Kyl added.
Posted by:gorb

#6  Tar and feathers.
Posted by: SR-71   2010-02-24 17:04  

#5  But Harry, We are Crying over you!

Posted by: Roy Orbison22410   2010-02-24 12:21  

#4  Harry Reid in 2005:

"...Senate Republicans are trying to change the filibuster rules in the Senate and eliminate debate. By going “nuclear,” they will be able to remove the one check on President Bush’s power in Washington and turn the Senate into a rubber stamp for his judicial appointments and Supreme Court nominees.

“Our founding fathers built a system of checks and balances into our Constitution,” Reid continued. “This system has worked for over 200 years, but is now threatened by a handful of power hungry Republicans who will do whatever they want to get their way.”
Posted by: Glomock Tojo6610   2010-02-24 12:00  

#3  Subversive support. I like it!
Posted by: gorb   2010-02-24 11:22  

#2  Why cry?

Just 'cause it's illegal what Reid is doing ...

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2010-02-24 11:21  

#1  Oddly enough, I agree with Harry on this one. Republicans should be *threatening* against reconciliation, that if Harry pushes it through, as soon as the Republicans are back in power, they are going to not just *reverse* Obamacare, but they are going go further in the direction of "privatizing" health care than we are right now.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2010-02-24 09:09  

00:00