You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Bluest states also most in debt, highly unionized and solidly Democrat (But that's all coincidental, right?)
2010-03-01
Forbes magazine has completed a comprehensive look at "The Global Debt Bomb" and in the course of compiling the results found this very interesting tidbit:

"The five states in the worst financial condition--Illinois, New York, Connecticut, California and New Jersey--are all among the bluest of blue states. The five most fiscally fit states are more of a mix. Three--Utah, Nebraska and Texas--boast Republican majorities and two--New Hampshire and Virginia--skew Democratic."

But wait, it's actually more serious than that when you look at the 10 states in the worst financial condition, according to Forbes:

"Of the 10 states in the worst financial condition, eight are among a total of 23 defined by Gallup as "solidly Democratic," meaning the Democrats enjoy an advantage of 10 percentage points or greater in party affiliation. These states include the ones listed above as making up the bottom five, plus Massachusetts, Ohio and Wisconsin.

"Of the three other basement-dwellers, Kentucky is defined as "leaning Democratic" (a five- to 10-percentage-point Democratic advantage) and the remaining two--Louisiana and Mississippi--are termed politically "Competitive" (less than a five-percentage-point advantage for either party). Louisiana tilts slightly Democratic and Mississippi slightly Republican."

Forbes quotes an Illinois political science professor who explains why these rankings turn out as they do:

"Why do Democratic states appear to be struggling more than Republican ones? It comes down to stronger unions and a larger appetite for public programs, according to Kent Redfield, professor emeritus of political studies and public affairs at the University of Illinois' Center for State Policy and Leadership.

"'Unions in general have more influence in Democratic-controlled states,' he says. 'This isn't to say that unions are bad, but where they're strong you have bigger demands for social services and coalitions with construction companies, road builders and others that push up debt.'"

There is much, much more to the Forbes piece, which you can read in its entirety here.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Hey, a Racism Tax - the perfect way to redress historical grievances AND amass more boodle for political ends.
Posted by: SteveS   2010-03-01 15:06  

#4  Careful, lex. They'll call you a racist...and then they'll raise your taxes.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-03-01 11:45  

#3  California = America's future.

Time to start thinking of ourselves as Latin America North
Posted by: lex   2010-03-01 09:55  

#2  It comes down to stronger unions and a larger appetite for public programs

Paid for by others with no such appetites.

This isn't to say that unions are bad, but where they're strong you have bigger demands for social services and coalitions with construction companies, road builders and others that push up debt.

As an employee of a road builder, I must point out how little influence we have on where the money is spent. Northern Virginia's road network is severely underfunded, but the Legislature still refuses to raise taxes on the entire Commonwealth. Besides which, if we build something, everybody gets to use it. How is that similar to a social service? Is every driver also on welfare?
Posted by: Bobby   2010-03-01 05:58  

#1  Don't Cry For Me Argentina by Sarah Brightman

There violins for all the "Blue States"... time to get real children, your politics brought your states to economic failure. You can't have it all, all the time. Grow-up.
Posted by: Throck Protector of the Welsh4374   2010-03-01 01:02  

00:00