You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Idaho first to sign law against health care reform
2010-03-19
Idaho is leading the charge in a states-rights push to defeat a proposal in Congress that would require people to buy health insurance, a key piece of reforms being pushed by President Barack Obama.

Republican Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter used a ceremony Wednesday afternoon to become the first governor to sign into law a measure requiring the state attorney general to sue the federal government over any such insurance mandates.

There's similar legislation pending in 37 other states, a point Otter stressed when asked if the bill he signed can succeed, given constitutional law experts are already saying federal laws would supersede those of states in a U.S. District Court fight.

"The ivory tower folks will tell you, 'No, they're not going anywhere,'" he told reporters. "But I'll tell you what, you get 36 states, that's a critical mass. That's a constitutional mass."

The state measures working their ways through statehouses from Missouri to South Carolina reflect a growing frustration with President Obama's health care overhaul, especially in Republican-dominated regions.

The Democratic president's proposal would cover some 30 million uninsured people, end insurance practices such as denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions, require almost all Americans to get coverage by law, and try to slow the cost of medical care nationwide.

Democratic leaders hope to vote on it this weekend.

With Washington closing in on a deal in the monthslong battle over health care overhaul, Republican state lawmakers are stepping up opposition.

Last week, Virginia legislators passed a measure similar to Idaho's new law, but Otter was the first state chief executive to sign such a bill, according to the American Legislative Exchange Council, which created model legislation for Idaho and other states. The Washington, D.C.,-based nonprofit group promotes limited government.
Posted by:Fred

#3  Um , unfortunately, OUR tax dollars ALREADY pay for the health care of the chronically obese smokers and all the illegals. Wake up!
Posted by: 746   2010-03-19 12:21  

#2  "...require almost all Americans to get coverage by law..."

That's BS right there. Only about half of us will be subsidizing the 400 lb. smoker I saw standing in line at McD's, not to mention the 20 million illegals.
Posted by: Gomez Threter7450   2010-03-19 11:17  

#1  I don't see how you can force people to buy health care insurance at risk of penalty, loss of property or even jail time. The IRS will monitor and enforce this requirement. I see a lot of lawsuits in the courts, civil disobedience, and/or insurrection in the streets. Martin Luther King made a pretty fair argument for resisting laws which were unjust. It seems to me that forcing someone to buy something deprives them of their civil rights. If the government can force you to buy insurance, they can force you to buy anything. This is not the same as buying homeowner's insurance or car insurance.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-03-19 10:06  

00:00