You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Man Billed 'Crash Tax' For Emergency Response
2010-04-08
If you get into a car accident and 911 is called, you may get billed for the emergency response. Cash-strapped communities are sending out bills to cover the costs of fire trucks responding to crashes. As CBS 2 Investigator Dave Savini reports, often times it does not matter whether you caused the accident or are the victim.
If we don't pay taxes for 911 services why do we pay taxes?
Cary Feldman received one of these bills last summer. He was driving his motor scooter in Chicago Heights when he was struck from behind. He was fine, but someone else called 911, and a fire truck was sent to the scene.

Feldman says it was unnecessary. "There was no fire, there was no explosion, there was no debris," Feldman said. "From what I saw, they came, they saw, and they left." The fire department then sent him a $200 bill for that fire truck response. "We're paying taxes for these services," said Feldman. "We don't need to have a second tax."
But perhaps the first tax should be higher to match the actual cost of having the service.
Motorists across the country are calling these fees a "crash tax" -- alleged strong arm tactics angering many, especially when the accidents they are being billed for are not their fault.

Nine states have created laws banning these fees. Illinois has no ban on these so-called "crash taxes." In fact, pending Illinois legislation would allow municipalities to charge up to $250 an hour for an emergency response.

Illinois Representative Karen Yarbrough is working on this issue and wants the pending legislation killed. "Bad bill, very bad bill," said Yarbrough. "This is just another way to reach into a consumer's pocket."

"I think the State of Illinois needs to take some actions to stop this from happening," said Feldman.

Aside from the cost, there is concern that people will be afraid to call 911. That's what happened last month in South Carolina. A couple tried using a hose to put out their house fire in order to avoid being billed by the fire department.

Once you're billed, as Feldman learned, there is no process to fight it. There is no court date. You just have to pay the fee, or the consequences.
Posted by:Fred

#6  Don't forget its common for a mayor or city council to first budget their own 'pet' project then give whatever is left to Police / Fire / Medical.

Then they go to the voters for a 'special levy' (because they don't have the budget....) for the services they should have budgeted first. Knowing that most people won't vote against essential services.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-04-08 23:55  

#5  P2K, that is how it used to be. People paid a subscription for the fire department to show up to your house. Cities saw that it would be for the public good to make it a municipal service - Chicago and London fires make great examples. Thing is, firefighter unions don't like volunteer services, so they would detest the concept of private fire service.

This all was predicted a few weeks ago when that city in CA was considering an emergency response charge. In the places this catches on, you will find the fire department showing up for every single call they can get a truck there - and can justify it by the diverse set of skills and tools fire departments offer. All they have to do is show up and check in before the incident is over, even if just minutes before the official conclusion of incident. You are going to just love it when detained 15 minutes longer than necessary for a fire truck to show up, take a look, give all clear, and travel off in their suburban mobile tool set vehicle to the next call.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2010-04-08 11:44  

#4  That's what happened last month in South Carolina. A couple tried using a hose to put out their house fire in order to avoid being billed by the fire department.

I wonder if that's the whole story. When I lived in Savannah you had to pay a seperate fire dept fee. If a fire happened the fire dept responded and ensured the fire didn't spread from the non payer to those that had paid the fee.
Posted by: Beavis   2010-04-08 11:31  

#3  Me: "Okay, I won't pay a penny over 65 dollars for that ambulance run to take me to the hospital for my heart attack!"

Shatner: "Attaboy, Steve, now you're negotiating the Priceline way!"
Posted by: Steve White   2010-04-08 11:21  

#2  But perhaps the first tax should be higher to match the actual cost of having the service.

Perhaps if we 'outsourced' the entire service maybe it'll have a lot less overhead. Companies bid on service like hotels bid on Priceline with an automated reroute on the line to the best offer by qualified carriers at the time of the call.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-04-08 10:22  

#1  And what if someone called 911 to show up at the Chicago Mayor's house because they thought they heard screaming?
Posted by: gorb   2010-04-08 01:39  

00:00