| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Short Attention Span Theater- |
| High Court Says Mojave Cross In Calif. Can Stay |
| 2010-04-28 |
| The Supreme Court said Wednesday that a federal court went too far in ordering the removal of a congressionally endorsed war memorial cross from its longtime home in California. In ruling the cross could stay, the justices said federal judges in California did not take sufficient notice of the government's decision to transfer the land in a remote area of California to private ownership. The move was designed to eliminate any constitutional concern about a religious symbol on public land. The ruling was 5-4, with the court's conservatives in the majority Who won't be for long -- just as soon as The One makes his selection, our entire court system changes. For decades. The Veterans of Foreign Wars erected the cross more than 75 years ago atop an outcropping in the Mojave National Preserve. It has been covered with plywood for the past several years following the court rulings. Court papers describe the cross as 5 feet to 8 feet tall. "Here one Latin cross in the desert evokes far more than religion. It evokes thousands of small crosses in foreign fields marking the graves of Americans who fell in battles, battles whose tragedies are compounded if the fallen are forgotten," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote. In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens agreed that soldiers who died in battle deserve a memorial to their service. But the government "cannot lawfully do so by continued endorsement of a starkly sectarian message," Stevens said. Six justices wrote separate opinions and none spoke for a majority of the court. The holding itself was narrow, ordering lower courts to look again at the transfer of land from the government to private control. Lower federal courts previously ruled that the cross' location on public land violated the Constitution and that the land transfer was, in effect, an end run around the constitutional problem. |
| Posted by:Sherry |
| #2 We won't miss you, Stevens. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-04-28 14:22 |
| #1 Actually, it doesn't, not yet. JP Stevens was both ultra liberal, and was given a modicum of respect by the conservatives solely for his age, if not his legal sense or wit. But no matter how radical Barry-O's replacement for him is, the edge still stays 5-4 in favor of conservatives. But heaven help us all if anything happens to one of the conservatives. The liberals will always vote in a leftist bloc, no matter the issue. Only the conservatives ever give cases consideration beyond politics. One heartbeat away from socialism. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2010-04-28 11:42 |