You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghan's Karzai charm attack may not be enough
2010-05-14
[Al Arabiya Latest] He lunched at the White House, was feted at the State Department and dined with the vice president but will the special treatment lavished on Afghan President Hamid Karzai affect how he governs?
I think he would just be happy if American officials limited themselves to sniping about him privately, instead of shouting it from the mountaintops, completely undermining his ability to accomplish anything.
What is key will be whether the much-touted good atmospherics during Karzai's four-day trip to Washington will speed up what President Barack Obama calls "slow and steady" progress in Afghanistan.

"What is being said in public is anodyne and choreographed. Talk is good but it is the actions that are taken that will be important," said Brian Katulis of the Center for American Progress, a liberal think-tank in Washington.

The handshakes and uneasy smiles in the White House East Room on Wednesday contrasted with the war of words in recent weeks but that does not mean the Obama administration or U.S. lawmakers, who hold the purse strings, are fully confident.

Questions persist in Congress, and quietly among U.S. officials, over whether the Afghan leader can be counted on to help momentum shift enough to allow U.S. troops to start coming home in July 2011 as promised.

"He needs to work with the U.S. in both word and deed to promote economic development, build the Afghan security forces, combat extremists, tackle the drug trade, eliminate corruption, and improve systems of governance," said Senator Ted Kaufman, who was in Afghanistan last month.

Former U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad said Obama's better ties with Karzai were just a start.

"If the situation improves, I think things in terms of relations between Karzai and the administration will also improve. But if they get worse or stay the same then I think we will come back to the same contentiousness," Khalilzad told PBS.
Posted by:Fred

#1  The western countries decided in Bonn to impose a strong central government where none had ever existed, across different groups with different customs.

The track record of such attempts is poor. However, part of the corruption and violence problem in Afghan is due to the Islamicists who have been systematically killing moderate local leaders by the hundreds. So the old social structures are destroyed and into that vacuum comes the poppy trade (and corruption), the huge US/Western presence with reconstruction monies (and corruption) and the various opposition groups, among them the Taleban (who are benefitting from drug monies and corruption).
Posted by: lotp   2010-05-14 07:21  

00:00