You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Candidate's Words on Vietnam Service Differ From History
2010-05-18
At a ceremony honoring veterans and senior citizens who sent presents to soldiers overseas, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (Democrat) of Connecticut rose and spoke of an earlier time in his life.

“We have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam,' Mr. Blumenthal said to the group gathered in Norwalk in March 2008. “And you exemplify it. Whatever we think about the war, whatever we call it — Afghanistan or Iraq — we owe our military men and women unconditional support.'

There was one problem: Mr. Blumenthal, a Democrat now running for the United States Senate, never served in Vietnam. He obtained at least five military deferments from 1965 to 1970 and took repeated steps that enabled him to avoid going to war, according to records.

The deferments allowed Mr. Blumenthal to complete his studies at Harvard; pursue a graduate fellowship in England; serve as a special assistant to The Washington Post's publisher, Katharine Graham; and ultimately take a job in the Nixon White House.

In 1970, with his last deferment in jeopardy, he enlisted in the Marine Reserve, landing a coveted spot in a unit in Washington, which virtually guaranteed that he would not be sent to Vietnam. The unit conducted part-time drills and other exercises and focused on local projects, like fixing a campground and organizing a Toys for Tots drive.

Many politicians have faced questions over their decisions during the Vietnam War, and Mr. Blumenthal, who is seeking the seat being vacated by Senator Christopher J. Dodd, is not alone in staying out of the war.

But what is striking about Mr. Blumenthal's record is the contrast between the many steps he took that allowed him to avoid Vietnam, and the misleading way he often speaks about that period of his life now, especially when he is speaking at veterans' ceremonies or other patriotic events.

Sometimes his remarks have been plainly untrue, as in his speech to the group in Norwalk. At other times, he has used more ambiguous language, but the impression left on audiences can be similar.

In an interview on Monday, the attorney general said that he had misspoken about his service during the Norwalk event and might have misspoken on other occasions. “My intention has always been to be completely clear and accurate and straightforward, out of respect to the veterans who served in Vietnam,' he said.
Posted by: Anonymoose

#10  Facts, why should facts get in the way. Unless you want to be allowed to enter an auditorium where the President is speaking, then you have to show your papers. How ironic.
Posted by: Pearl Wheater8574   2010-05-18 15:08  

#9  IMHO he may have mis-spoke but intentionally did not correct himself. It was only after confronted with the facts that he "corrected" the statement.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2010-05-18 14:54  

#8  For his super Blue constituency he may be better off to have lied about Vietnam service than to have actually been there.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-05-18 11:17  

#7  Remember it's how he feels not about facts for his real constituents. And that's why they'll still vote for him, because that's their standard to adjudge a person. He's just the poster child for their shallowness and be sure to watch them reaffirm that.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-05-18 09:08  

#6  A democrat who lies? Say it ain't so!

And that is what this is. Not 'misquoted' or 'misspoken' - the guy L-I-E-D.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-05-18 08:48  

#5  the left is already trying to cover his tracks. Marc Ambinder at the Atlantic says "the facts are not unambiguous". When you have to speak that doublespeak to try and cover for a clear lie, you are also a tool, Marc. F*ck you and lying Blumenthal
Posted by: Frank G   2010-05-18 08:38  

#4  Not the person we want in Washington. We have too many already who will say anything to get elected.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-05-18 08:17  

#3  You're a loser blumenthal......a chicken shit loser......sorry, had to be said.....wish he would actually read this. He should be arrested for stolen valor.
Posted by: armyguy   2010-05-18 07:42  

#2  "My intention has always been to be completely clear and accurate and straightforward"

obviously not; his intention was to deceive
Posted by: lord garth   2010-05-18 06:37  

#1  
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2010-05-18 00:41  

00:00