| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| Gates Warns Europe Could Face Hundreds Of Iranian Missiles |
| 2010-06-18 |
| U.S. intelligence showing Iran likely would have the capability to attack Europe with "scores or even hundreds" of missiles factored into the Obama administration's decision to overhaul missile defenses, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Thursday. Citing the growing Iranian missile threat, the United States announced plans last September to integrate sea- and land-based missile defenses in and around its NATO allies in Europe, referred to as the "phased adaptive approach." "One of the elements of the intelligence that contributed to the decision on the phased adaptive array (approach) was the realization that if Iran were actually to launch a missile attack on Europe, it wouldn't be just one or two missiles, or a handful," Gates said at a congressional hearing. "It would more likely be a salvo kind of attack, where you would be dealing potentially with scores or even hundreds of missiles." Gates voiced confidence that upgraded missile interceptors in development "would give us the ability to protect our troops, our bases, our facilities and our allies in Europe." Gates said having those interceptor systems in place by around 2020 was critical not only because of the missile threat from Iran and North Korea, but because "I think by 2020 we may well see it from other states, especially if we're unsuccessful in stopping Iran from building nuclear weapons." Earlier in the hearing, however, Gates sought to allay Russian concerns about the new U.S. approach to missile defenses in Europe by playing down the system's ability to counter a large-scale attack from Russia. RUSSIANS 'HATE IT' "Our missile defenses do not have the capability to defend against the Russian Federation's large, advanced arsenal. Consequently, U.S. missile defenses do not and will not affect Russia's strategic deterrent," Gates said. "The Russians know that our missile defenses are designed to intercept a limited number of ballistic missiles launched by a country such as Iran or North Korea," he said. The Obama administration has held out the possibility that Moscow could take part in the missile defense system in partnership with the United States. But Gates said: "There is no meeting of the minds on missile defense. The Russians hate it. They've hated it since the late 1960s. They will always hate it, mostly because we'll build it and they won't." U.S. intelligence agencies have long warned about Iran's growing missile threat and officials say anti-ballistic missile systems should cover all of Europe by 2018. The multibillion-dollar effort is designed to defend against Iranian missiles that could be tipped with chemical, biological or nuclear warheads, officials say. According to U.S. estimates, Iran could produce enough bomb-grade fuel for a nuclear weapon in as little as one year but would probably need three to five years to deploy a "usable" one. Like the great Orson Welles movie, 'The Man Who Saw Tomorrow' (1981), which showed a blue turbanned Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launching salvos of missiles at civilization. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose |
| #5 PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUMS > WORLD [Read, espec INDIA] MUST RECOGNIZE PAKISTAN AS A NUCLEAR POWER: GENERAL MAJID [ GEN. Tariq Majid, PAK Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman] | [Majid]WORLD MUST UNDERSTAND PAKISTAN'S INTERNAL, EXTERNAL SECURITY CONCERNS. IIUC MAJOD > PAK's DEV OF NUKE ARMS THE ONLY PRAGMATIC OR REALISTIC WAY FOR ISLAMABAD = PAK TO COUNTER THE VARIOUS MULTI-STATE [Also read, MILITANTS] REGIONAL MIL-NUKE BUILDUPS IN OCCURRENCE, CURR OR FUTURE. * SAME > INDIA: NUCLEAR DEAL/N-DEAL WID PAKISTAN MAY HARM TIES WID CHINA. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-06-18 20:20 |
| #4 SpaceWars reporting of same story |
| Posted by: 3dc 2010-06-18 11:37 |
| #3 I wonder if Gates mentioned one of the features of basing an ABM system on shipboard Aegis is it can be recalled at a moment's notice. |
| Posted by: ed 2010-06-18 11:16 |
| #2 "Oh, and did I mention the 'you're on your own' part?..." |
| Posted by: mojo 2010-06-18 10:59 |
| #1 Good luck convincing EUros that it isn't just Israel's problem. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2010-06-18 04:50 |