You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
BP oil well kill plan delayed
2010-07-26
[Iran Press TV Latest] BP's plan to permanently stop the oil leakage of the Gulf of Mexico has been postponed to next week, US oil spill chief Thad Allen has said.

"So generally the next week will be preps, making sure everything is ready to go... and then the week of the first of August is when we will attempt to do the static kill and then move back and finish the bottom kill," Allen said.

He added that it was just an updated timeline provided by BP that had caused the delay, not any major force.

The oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico started in April after an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon offshore rig caused the sinking of the facility. Eleven people died in the blast.

The well has poured millions of barrels of crude into the sea, creating the worst environmental disaster in the US history.
Posted by:Fred

#6  It would probably be extremely naive to hope that they would get to the point to where they could reenter and log the casing before they cement it. But oh boy! Wouldn't it be nice to know what actually did go wrong.
Posted by: junkiron   2010-07-26 15:11  

#5  The current well cannot be produced. It is leaky and unsafe AT BEST, and facilities that have been used to capture some of the oil cost more to operate than the oil is worth.

The static kill is a variant of the initial 'Top Kill' attempt that failed; current belief is that the new cap they installed a couple of weeks ago will give this version a better chance to work. They seem to have changed their minds about damage to the shallow casing and leakage into shallow rock layers - sure hope they're right, but time will tell.

Relief wells are NOT intended to produce the oil. The first one is meant to drill into the blowout well a little above the oil-productive rock layer and allow heavy drill mud to be injected into the flow such that back pressure develops to stop the oil flow, and then follow it with cement. It should work with or without the static kill, but it should work with less risk if the static kill works. The second relief well is just a backup in case something goes wrong with the first one (that one might be redirected in the future to produce some of the reserves that didn't get blown out.)
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-07-26 08:18  

#4  I believe that's the purpose of the relief well they are currently drilling. It will be an alternate route for the oil to get out and then the current, leaky, hole can be stopped up. But we'll have to wait for one of our late sleeping ChemEs to awaken before we will know definitively.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-07-26 07:02  

#3  But they'll get the oil, eventually?
Posted by: Bobby   2010-07-26 05:53  

#2  Because under the base of this well, it is unstable and leaks horizontal under the rock beds.

Posted by: newc   2010-07-26 05:23  

#1  Why do they need to kill this well? Why not just take the oil out of it?
Posted by: gorb   2010-07-26 00:47  

00:00