You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Bradley Manning, suspected source of Wikileaks documents, raged on his Facebook page
2010-07-31
The US Army intelligence analyst, who is half British and went to school in Wales, appeared to sink into depression after a relationship break-up, saying he didn't "have anything left" and was "beyond frustrated".

In an apparent swipe at the army, he also wrote: "Bradley Manning is not a piece of equipment," and quoted a joke about "military intelligence" being an oxymoron.

Mr Manning, 22, who is currently awaiting court martial, is suspected of leaking more than 90,000 secret military documents to the Wikileaks website in a security breach which US officials claim has endangered the lives of serving soldiers and Afghan informers.

Supporters claim the war logs leak exposed civilian deaths in Afghanistan which had been covered up by the military, and Mr Manning's family, who live in Pembrokeshire, said he had "done the right thing".

The Pentagon, which is investigating the source of the leak, is expected to study Mr Manning's background to ascertain if they missed any warnings when he applied to join the US Army. The postings on his Facebook page are also likely to form part of the inquiry.

Mr Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January 12, saying: "Bradley Manning didn't want this fight. Too much to lose, too fast."

At the beginning of May, when he was serving at a US military base near Baghdad, he changed his status to: "Bradley Manning is now left with the sinking feeling that he doesn't have anything left."

Five days later he said he was "livid" after being "lectured by ex-boyfriend", then later the same day said he was "not a piece of equipment" and was "beyond frustrated with people and society at large".

His tagline on his personal page reads: "Take me for who I am, or face the consequences!"

Mr Manning was arrested at the end of May on suspicion of leaking a video of a US helicopter attack, and quickly became the main suspect when the Afghan war documents were leaked earlier this week.

His uncle, Kevin Fox, said the soldier's arrest and imprisonment in a military jail had taken its toll on his mother Susan, who lives in Haverfordwest.

"She hasn't been well," he said, adding that if Mr Manning had leaked the documents: "I think the boy did the right thing."

Another close relative, who asked not to be named, said: "His mum didn't know anything about what he was doing and it's come as a big shock. She's very upset."

Susan Manning, 56, moved to the US in 1979 after marrying Bradley's American father Brian Manning, a former serviceman who was based at the Cawdor Barracks in Brawdy, near Haverfordwest.

Bradley Manning was born in Oklahoma but the couple divorced in 2001 and Mrs Manning moved back to Wales with her son, who sat his GCSEs at the Tasker Milward secondary school in Haverfordwest.
Posted by:tipper

#13  This guy sounds like Intel records clerk and the messages are hardly "Top Secret" as far as I can tell. The guy obviously had access to a repository of classified reports (prob on a server). Yes we give E-1s clearances Top Secret and above if they need to do their job. We can't detect whacko, but I bet his fellow soldiers will shed some light on that.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2010-07-31 21:42  

#12  Old saying: Two can keep a secret if one of them is dead. Corollary: If you want ANY chance at all of keeping it secret, don't put it on a hard drive...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2010-07-31 20:39  

#11  You have to wonder what happened to "need to know". It used to be that intelligence files were hard copy folders physically located in a fixed location, with limited copies circulated to those who needed to know, whether they were people who specifically requested them, or task-related personnel. These days, with the computerization of, and universal access to (provided permission is given), military intelligence data, it appears that lazy system administrators or ignorant policy-makers have given the keys to the kingdom to mere privates. I am glad we have found out about these lapses during the equivalent of a bush war, rather than an all-out war (i.e. war with a peer competitor like Russia or China).
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2010-07-31 16:41  

#10  Check to see who he winds up with as his defense counsel. If he winds up with a phalanx of these treasonous tools at his defense table, to me that'll serve as ABSOLUTE CONFIRMATION that this "leak scandal" was set up by Ogabe appointees in the DoD to assist in the undermining of our war effort.
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2010-07-31 16:20  

#9  -- how often do junior enlisted personnel get secret and top-secret clearances, and how often are they entrusted with classified information?

It is very common for lower raking enlisted personnel to have a SECRET clearance, granted or based on a National Agency Check or NAC. Today, many battlefield systems as well as information systems require a Secret or what is referred to as "collateral access" as do facilities in which sensitive operational planning is conducted. A Top Secret or TS level of clearance is a lengthy process (can take up to 2 years) which is generally initiated based on the soldier's need or anticipated need for specific access to TS level documents or systems. Interum access is sometimes granted pending final adjudication of the TS clearance. There are numerous security level caveats beyond TS which can also be required and granted as well. Eligability for these caveats is based once again, on very specific needs. Other government agencies have entirely different processes and proceduress which generally parallel that of DoD, but can require much more stringent and evasive updates and personnel monitoring procedures.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-07-31 13:49  

#8  Leadership Management Education & Training (LMET).
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-07-31 13:30  

#7  It does beg the question, and since I'm not mil/ex-mil, perhaps someone at Rantburg U can answer the question --

-- how often do junior enlisted personnel get secret and top-secret clearances, and how often are they entrusted with classified information?

I can imagine that a PFC might have assignments that would require them to handle classified info and therefore be screened, etc., but is that typical?

Second question: if PFC Manning was screened, did the personnel doing said screening uncover any warning signs? If not, why not -- seems like they were right there in the open.
Posted by: Steve White   2010-07-31 13:27  

#6  The Army had three failures involving leadership involving supervision of immediate subordinates. Abu Ghraib, Major Hasan, and the Wikileaker. All three were strategic defeats of the order of losing a battle. None involved direct combat arms on combat situations.

The Army needs to update its LMET courses to include these failures.
Posted by: Penguin   2010-07-31 13:26  

#5  #3 Hmmm. A PFC with waaaaay more access to large volumes of classified info than he should have had

I'm thinking the same thing.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-07-31 12:57  

#4  Too bad, kid. No Facebook in Quantico. Probably gay sex though, so at least you got that going for you. But it might be a little rougher then you're used to.
See ya in about a hundred years. Maybe Assange will send you a Christmas card...
Posted by: tu3031   2010-07-31 12:18  

#3  Hmmm. A PFC with waaaaay more access to large volumes of classified info than he should have had - check. Said PFC with a seriously dodgy background - check. Can you say "Obamunist-engineered intentional leak for the purpose of helping The One's media operatives undermine the war effort," boys and girls? I knew you could!

[/Mr. Rogers]
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2010-07-31 12:05  

#2  When did he allegedly start downloading this stuff?
Posted by: gorb   2010-07-31 11:41  

#1  FTA: "Mr Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January...."

So much for don't ask, don't tell. Must have been a really thorough background check, NOT.
Posted by: tipover   2010-07-31 11:03  

00:00