You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
--Tech
Spend $105. Make Righthaven go away.
2010-10-28
"Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, a website enjoys effective immunity from civil copyright liability for user content, provided they, promptly remove infringing material at the request of a rightsholder. ThatÂ’s how sites like YouTube are able to exist...[snip]. But to dock in that legal safe harbor, a site has to, among other things, register an official contact point for DMCA takedown notices, a process that involves filling out a form and mailing a check to the government. An examination of RighthavenÂ’s lawsuits targeting user content suggests itÂ’s specifically going after sites that failed to fill out that paperwork."
Posted by:Iblis

#10  I'm in
Posted by: Frank G   2010-10-28 21:36  

#9  The 31st is payday.

And far too late to make meaningful political donations.

Just sayin'.....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-10-28 21:34  

#8  Fred, look for an envelope in the mail. I was due, anyway.
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-10-28 21:26  

#7  Couldn't do $105, so I gave $15. That's like half isn't it?
:-0
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2010-10-28 17:51  

#6  Done
Posted by: phil_b   2010-10-28 17:44  

#5  More to come about Rantburg's status with Righthaven later. Fred has done the DMCA thing -- out of his pocket.

Pay attention to the top of the page --- click on that and send Fred 5 bucks, he needs it -- for one day, you can go without that expensive cup of coffee.
Posted by: Sherry   2010-10-28 11:47  

#4  Gorb:

Righthaven is specifically avoiding sites this mechanism.

And copyright suits are generally not defensible based on plaintif's dereliction. It's basically strict liability.
Posted by: Iblis   2010-10-28 10:31  

#3  Does Righthaven have a history of using this mechanism to have its copyrighted material removed from websites that use it, or do they just let it sit there because they really don't care about it?

If a company has a history of lax protection of its IP, I have been told that it's difficult to win court cases.
Posted by: gorb   2010-10-28 10:23  

#2  That's an unhappy question, Nimble Spemble.
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-10-28 09:28  

#1  How much are they trying to extort shakedown settle for with Rantburg?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-10-28 07:10  

00:00