You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Congressmen pay wives from campaign funds
2010-11-11
[Chicago Tribune] Two Illinois congressmen have paid their wives hundreds of thousands of dollars out of their campaign funds in the last decade, according to records filed with the Federal Election Commission.

The campaign to re-elect Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. has given wife Sandi Jackson's company at least $315,000 for her work. Rep. Bobby Rush's campaign has paid his wife, Carolyn Rush, more than $240,000 to serve as a consultant.

Two other Chicago-area congressmen, Danny Davis and Luis Gutierrez, have given their wives smaller amounts for doing campaign work. The four politicians, all Democrats, were re-elected last week.

The campaign payments to spouses did not involve any taxpayer money, and the practice has been declared legal if certain requirements are met. Nevertheless, some watchdog groups see the potential for abuse when a politician's family receives financial support from his political backers.

"Is there anything patently wrong with having a family member work on a campaign?" said Dave Levinthal, communications director at the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. "Arguably not. But it gets into sticky territory when the candidate, him or herself, stands to benefit personally in a significant way from political donations that are being made to fuel political efforts."

In addition to the four, at least two other Chicago-area members of the U.S. House -- Republicans Don Manzullo and Mark Kirk, who is now senator-elect -- have put relatives on their campaign payroll.

The Tribune identified those relatives by checking the last names of campaign-fund recipients and confirming family connections. But such a list cannot be considered complete, since any candidates' relatives whose last names were different from theirs would not be included.

Lawmakers are barred from employing relatives in their official offices, but a 2001 opinion issued by the Federal Election Commission -- at Jackson's request -- declared the practice legal for campaign committees, as long as the relative is qualified and is paid no more than the market rate.
Posted by:Fred

#8  Colorado rumor is that (R Gov candidate) Dan Maes was paying all kinds of family members fomr his campaign funds - one of them so he could pay his mortgage (by paying his wife, etc). He is being investigated or so goes the rumor
Posted by: OldSpook   2010-11-11 21:51  

#7  Illinois politicians. I hate those guys.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2010-11-11 17:13  

#6  Illinois politicians. Color me surprised.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2010-11-11 16:28  

#5  Getting elected to Congress seems to be a free pass to an all-you-can-eat-buffet.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-11-11 13:41  

#4  So what? They also exempt themselves from the Insider Trading laws. Equal protection my a$$.

Going to Congress means you get rich, and because they 'police' themselves, it isn't going to change.
Posted by: Iblis   2010-11-11 12:18  

#3  Besoeker: no.
Posted by: Steve White   2010-11-11 11:43  

#2  Nice work if you can get it.
Posted by: Steve White   2010-11-11 11:42  

#1  Any payments made from Obama campaign funding to the University of Chicago Medical Center?
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-11-11 06:08  

00:00