You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Great Recession Improving US Air Quality
2011-01-16
Posted by:Anguper Hupomosing9418

#8  The purpose of a regulatory agency is to REGULATE. If people do not follow the regulations, they will be fined and/or jailed until they and everyone else obeys. If everyone follows the regulations, the only thing the regulatory agency can do is to come up with more regulations. And the great circle of life continues.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2011-01-16 15:57  

#7  Very soon they're going to end domestic food production via regulatory fiat. After we all starve the air will be pristine!
Posted by: AzCat   2011-01-16 13:10  

#6  Actually, that's part of the problem.

Make stuff here? Get taxed massively.

Import stuff from elsewhere? "Hey, don't you believe in free trade?"
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2011-01-16 12:46  

#5  But for the most part we have exported our air pollution to China.

Oh, goodie. Bring that up. Give them a rationalization for more taxes. It's not an 'unfair' trade tariff, it's a air quality surcharge.
Posted by: Procopius2k    2011-01-16 10:42  

#4  Imagine how much less pollution we'd have without 15 million illegals.
Posted by: Jack Salami   2011-01-16 10:26  

#3  Even in the 60's our air was not 'terrible,' thought it HAS improved a lot, and I appreciate that. There were pockets of terrible air, especially during weather inversions, and to a lesser degree there still are. But for the most part we have exported our air pollution to China.
Posted by: Glenmore   2011-01-16 09:51  

#2  The left, however, has concluded that the only way things can be improved further, is to stop all energy production in the United States.

and with CO2 declared a pollutant, quit exhaling
Posted by: Frank G   2011-01-16 08:58  

#1  The US has long hence reached the point of diminishing returns with air quality.

In the 1960s, our air was terrible. The combination of using better quality crude oil, with much less sulfur; unleaded gasoline, because of better engines; and catalytic converters radically improved air quality.

This continued in the 1970s, with industries being forced to scrub their waste smoke, and the 1980s being forced to reduce toxic waste gases, mostly nitrous oxides that created the infamous "acid rain."

And that was 80-90% of the problem. But making our air cleaner than that, suddenly the cost and difficulty goes through the roof. The reason is that much of the remaining "pollutants", like 'particulates', are natural.

This didn't stop the EPA, a decade ago, from at least considering that Phoenix should reduce its dust particulates by "watering down the desert". While ludicrous, it points out where we are now in terms of diminishing returns.

The left, however, has concluded that the only way things can be improved further, is to stop all energy production in the United States.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-01-16 08:51  

00:00