You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Mubarak's kid flees to Britain
2011-01-26
[Iran Press TV] The Egyptian president's son has decamped to Britain as thousands continue to protest across the country against Hosni Mubarak's decades-long rule.

Mubarak's son, who is considered his successor, left the country along with his family amid the anti-government protests across Egypt which are the largest since Mubarak took power three decades ago.

The plane with Jamal Mubarak, his wife and daughter on board left for London Tuesday from an airport in western Cairo, the US-based Arabic website, Akhbar al-Arab reported on Wednesday.

Officials did not immediately confirm the report while a front man from the US Embassy in Cairo categorically denied that Mubarak's decamped Egypt.

His departure comes as situation in Egypt remains tense with people pouring into the streets across the country to protest against Mubarak.

Heavily armed riot police have been deployed in major cities as the Egyptian government has banned any demonstrations, warning that protesters would be nabbed.

The opposition groups have called on people to take to the streets to continue anti-government protests.

At least four people, including a police officer, have already been killed in anti-government demonstrations across the country.
Posted by:Fred

#25  Shereter Poodle9774, I've only just seen your comment, so I won't be able to respond to your link before the rollover. But I will read it, as thoughtfully as I am capable of. The problem -- for me at least -- is that for so many things I don't know what I don't know until someone educates me. So thank you. Please do so again, the many times that I need it.

Zhang Fe, we agree on the reason America is hated more than the rest of the non-Muslim world by the Ummah. For the rest, you are right, but Muslim governments do push the anti-Zionism/antisemitism hard -- trying to distract them from bad governance. (Not that it appears to be working any more.) But their people are not better educated for Ramadan television series based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and maps missing a neighboring nation, however much they may not want it to be there. Were the maps correct, the teachers might (would probably) teach that Israel ought not be there, but that is different than "I can't see you, so you're not there!"
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-01-27 00:07  

#24  tw: you're wrong about ElBaradei. Maybe you shouldn't make statements on things you clearly know nothing of.

Here is an easily found news item
http://af.reuters.com/article/egyptNews/idAFLDE70P2JL20110126
Posted by: Shereter Poodle9774   2011-01-26 21:41  

#23  Duh! The US is at war with Islamonazis. Therefore the US needs allies who will kill Islamonazis.
Posted by: Jack Angurong1317   2011-01-26 21:35  

#22  The EGYPTIANS are agz Israel until Saddam, now Iran, etc. comes over the proverbial Hill agz them, then they're suddenly Israel's BFF-N-ALWAYS-WERE.

[ACTOR-COMEDIAN ROBIN "THE FRENCH ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY UNDENIABLY CATEGORICALLY ... HATE AMERICANS UNTIL THE GERMANS INVADE" WILLIAMS' post-911 TV skit here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-01-26 19:55  

#21  Mubarek wouldn't have nearly as much of a problem with the common people hating Israel if it weren't such a prominent part of the educational curriculum and so many government-sponsored television programs. Jew-hatred has been a convenient distraction for the peepul since 1948, while those who would rule them played with pan-Arab socialism (and got aid from the Soviet Union) and national strong man-ism (and got aid from the U.S.). America-hatred is a mere offshoot of the antisemitism, as the U.S. is seen as the country that keeps good Muslims from driving those juices into the see as they are entitled to do.

No offense, but this is complete tosh. For non-Western countries, territorial issues are extremely emotionally-charged*. We view Israel as a tiny sliver of land in the Mid East. They view Israel as land that was stolen** from them by Jews at gunpoint with assistance from the US. (The unfortunate thing is that Muhammad chose to make Jerusalem Islam's third holy city. That rubs salt into the open wound). Nobody has to wind a Muslim up about Israel - teaching an alternate view of Israel would be tantamount to treason. The US is hated not for its modernity or decadence - Japan and Europe are equally modern and arguably more decadent, and you don't really see that level of animosity. It is hated because it is seen as the only thing between the Muslim world and the re-establishment of Muslim rule over what is now Israel.

* Note the strong expressions of anger among ethnic Chinese around the world over Japan's temporary detention of Chinese fishermen who were fishing illegally in Japanese waters around the Senkakus.

** Now, the fact is that title to every piece of land in the world was originally established - some recently, some in antiquity - via the right of conquest. But you're going to have trouble convincing the average Muslim that land that he sees as legitimately Muslim really justly belongs to Jews. As to the idea that land titles established by the right of conquest ought to be frozen, in Israel's case, in 1948? Muslims are simply not going to accept it, barring some major revolution in thinking at the street level.

Note that during the Sino-Japanese war, it was not Chiang Kai-shek who wanted to escalate towards total war with Japan, despite Japanese incursions into China. He understood that China was weak and would suffer grievous losses against the Imperial Army. It was the Chinese people who were spoiling for a fight. In the end, they forced his hand. He went all against the Japanese, while the Communists sat out the war, and in so doing, lost the cream of his army (millions Nationalist dead vs 100K Communist dead) and eventually, China itself.

Bottom line, in the Mid-East, as elsewhere, the people are not zombies who will adopt the attitudes whatever ruler is in charge. Dictators do not command the absolute obedience of their generals or the public. If a dictator deviates too much from the attitudes of the public, especially in a way that is seen as treasonous, he will be deposed. There are many generals waiting in the wings for an opportunity to replace him.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-01-26 19:38  

#20  
Posted by: Water Modem   2011-01-26 19:25  

#19  Are weapons and terrorists flowing in the opposite direction in the tunnels?
Posted by: airandee   2011-01-26 19:25  

#18  I don't think anyone pays attention to Dr. Elbaradei. Yes, he was once in charge of Egypt's nuclear program, but he's been away for an awfully long time.

Mubarek wouldn't have nearly as much of a problem with the common people hating Israel if it weren't such a prominent part of the educational curriculum and so many government-sponsored television programs. Jew-hatred has been a convenient distraction for the peepul since 1948, while those who would rule them played with pan-Arab socialism (and got aid from the Soviet Union) and national strong man-ism (and got aid from the U.S.). America-hatred is a mere offshoot of the antisemitism, as the U.S. is seen as the country that keeps good Muslims from driving those juices into the see as they are entitled to do.
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-01-26 19:07  

#17  Do the Marines at the Cairo embassy have live ammo?

I'm kind of hoping they evacuate the embassy before we get another hostage type situation. On the other hand, it would be amusing to see how Obama, the uber-Carter, handles an embassy hostage situation.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-01-26 18:24  

#16  ElBaradei -- member him? former director of the UN nuclear "watchdog" and angered long ago by Sadat's refusal to let him develop nuclear weapons -- called on the Egyptian masses to join the street rallies against Mubarak.
Posted by: Shereter Poodle9774   2011-01-26 18:22  

#15  Once the Moslem Brotherhood rules Egypt, Iran will look like Liechtenstein. Thank you Carter, thank you Obama.
Posted by: Shereter Poodle9774   2011-01-26 18:04  

#14  An Islamist Middle East must be our biggest fear.
Posted by: Paul D   2011-01-26 18:02  

#13  Do the Marines at the Cairo embassy have live ammo?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2011-01-26 18:01  

#12  I don't think Hosni was 'pro-US', he was more 'pro-greenbacks'.

Mubarak's the most pro-US person who could simultaneously be a leader of Egypt. And that's his Achilles heel. The unfortunate bottom line is that our problem isn't with allied Muslim governments, most of which are presenting as pro-American a face as they can without being toppled - it's with the Muslim public.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-01-26 17:58  

#11  As Claire Berlinski via Instapundit notes, the US has been supporting Mubarak ever since he gained power, and Sadat before him. The Egyptian 'street' isn't going to think to kindly of us.

Both Berlinski and the Egyptian street are off their meds. US aid is mainly used to buy American weaponry. And the primary use for that weaponry? Fighting off Israel. Egypt's GDP is $188b. American aid = $1.3b. If Uncle Sam stops handing out free weaponry to Egypt, it will simply buy fewer tanks and F-16's. It's got no problem buying the stuff required to keep Mubarak in power. The primary reason Egyptians are angry at Mubarak (and Sadat) are not that they are dictators, but that they are not as hostile to Israel and the US as Egyptians think they ought to be. The Muslim Brotherhood is gaining in popularity despite the fact that it would merely create a religious dictatorship in place of a secular one because it is extremely virulent in its professed hatred for the Israel and the US. If Mubarak is weak enough to give in to Obama's demands that he step down, Egypt will eventually become the Middle East's third nuclear power, next to Israel and Iran.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-01-26 17:53  

#10  I don't think Hosni was 'pro-US', he was more 'pro-greenbacks'.
Posted by: Steve White   2011-01-26 17:48  

#9  Most likely the Muslim Brotherhood is instigating and fueling the protests despite claims of being non-violent. When it's over, they are waiting in the wings to take over. In the short run they don't care about losing seats in the government. They plan to get them back the next time around. Another Muslim country goes fundamentalist.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-01-26 17:47  

#8  The United States bluntly urged Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on Wednesday to make political reforms in the face of protesters demanding his ouster, marking a pivot in its stance toward a key Arab ally.

Goodbye Shah, hello Khomeini. Another Democratic administration, another anti-American administration in the Mid-East. I'm kinda hoping we can skip a re-enactment of the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-01-26 17:41  

#7  If Egypt loses Mubarak and the Muslim Brotherbood (or similar) group gets power, what are the chances Israel does something like regrabbing the Sinai to get a defendable depth?
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2011-01-26 17:31  

#6  Saudi next?
Posted by: Paul D   2011-01-26 17:30  

#5  Ho-ly crap.

As Claire Berlinski via Instapundit notes, the US has been supporting Mubarak ever since he gained power, and Sadat before him. The Egyptian 'street' isn't going to think to kindly of us.

Wow. Two Arab countries revolt in the same month. What were the stated odds of that happening back around Christmas?
Posted by: Steve White   2011-01-26 17:26  

#4  The protests are spreading to other cities.

Al jazeera reports major riots in Suez

British reporter describes being arrested and beaten.
Posted by: Frozen Al   2011-01-26 17:19  

#3  That's something we should have thought about as a nation before our sternly worded communique's to the Shah Mubarak.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2011-01-26 16:53  

#2  Is there any democratic parties we can back as we dont want the Brotherhood in control!
Posted by: Paul D   2011-01-26 16:30  

#1  From what I can glean (Israeli news source), the protests are a response to "alleged" election rigging. Since rigging is a way of life in this part of the world, most likely it is not only alleged but true. The election rigging has been an attempt to get rid of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Egyptian government. The rigged elections have swept out something like 88 Muslim Brotherhood seats in the government.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-01-26 15:07  

00:00