You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Oil Gains a 2nd Day as Egypt Unrest Prompts Concern
2011-02-03
Feb. 3 -- Oil advanced for a second day in New York as protests in Egypt turned violent, prompting concern that supplies may be disrupted and unrest may spread to other parts of the Middle East.

About 2.5 percent of global oil production moves through Egypt via the Suez Canal and the Suez-Mediterranean Pipeline, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

"If the Egyptian situation results in the removal of the current administration quickly, then the consequences may be that other regions will follow," Jonathan Barratt, managing director of Commodity Broking Services Pty in Sydney, said by telephone today. "It could create a contagion that could see the Middle Eastern premium being brought back in a big way because you do have that risk to the Suez."

The March contract gained as much as 31 cents, or 0.3 percent, to $91.17 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange and was at $91.16 at 11:38 a.m. in Sydney. Yesterday, it climbed 9 cents to settle at $90.86. Futures are up 18 percent the past year.

Brent crude for March settlement increased 60 cents, or 0.6 percent, to end the session at $102.34 a barrel on the London- based ICE Futures Europe exchange yesterday. It was the highest settlement price since Sept. 26, 2008.

Oil prices retreated yesterday after an Energy Department report showed that U.S. crude and gasoline supplies increased more than forecast last week. Crude inventories increased by 2.59 million barrels to 343.2 million in the week ended Jan. 28, the Energy Department said. They were forecast to climb by 2.5 million barrels, according to the median of 15 analyst estimates in a Bloomberg News survey.

There is "no real threat" to flows through the canal, Fatih Birol, chief economist at the International Energy Agency, said yesterday in a Bloomberg interview in Moscow. "We hope to see the market calm down because it is not good news for anybody in the market: consumers, producers or anybody."

Crude capped the biggest two-day rally since May on Jan. 31 on concern the unrest in North Africa will spread to crude- producing countries in the Middle East. Jordan's Prime Minister Samir Rifai resigned and King Abdullah asked Marouf Bakhit to form a new government.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  I don't think the events in Tunisia and Egypt will affect OPEC at all.
Posted by: gorb   2011-02-03 17:08  

#6  I'm with Donald Trump on this one.

He's probably right with the caveat that while OPEC might not be the least effective cartel in the history of the planet they're certainly in the running for that title. The ongoing implosion of the dollar and all of the world's fast money seeking safe havens from said event almost certainly have a much greater impact on oil prices than does OPEC.
Posted by: AzCat   2011-02-03 16:44  

#5  Overlap between corn and wheat belts - more 'n you'd think. I do technical and customer support for agricultural databases, with an emphasis on soil test data. Insofar as growers don't switch between the two in the corn belt, it's a cultural thing rather than a scientific thing. Although they don't double-crop wheat and soy in the deep cornbelt the way they do in the Mid-Atlantic.

Corn certainly has been displacing cotton in the Delta, and wheat used to be a significant secondary crop down in cotton country. I say "used to" only because we lost our major Delta country reseller three years back, and I don't deal with the Delta as much as I used to do. Not sure what they're up to these days - in 2008, it was the big, big push into corn for ethanol.

Anyways, corn and wheat can be demand-substituted, as well as imperfectly supply-substituted. When you're a bureaucrat stockpiling staples for His Excellency's rainy riot day fund, you'll buy whatever is cheapest, and if wheat's expensive-because-rare-due-to-bad-harvests and corn's priced out of your range due to ethanol (ptui!), you grab rice, which inflates because you and every other tinpot's bureaucratic purchasing agents are scrabbling for your respective hoards.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2011-02-03 13:42  

#4  Terminating the ethanol subsidy isn't going to do anything about the price of wheat; there isn't enough overlap between the corn belts and the wheat belts to matter in the first place.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2011-02-03 12:34  

#3  I'm actually pretty sanguine today that the Canal is safe, and this isn't going to infect the oil-producing regions, excepting maybe Algeria.

On the other hand, a food price shock seems to be in full effect, with word of various autocratic and authoritarian regimes hording the hell out of grain stocks in the wake of the two Maghreb uprisings. I say that it is a moral imperative that the US terminates the ethanol subsidy, immediately.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2011-02-03 09:52  

#2  ISRAEL NN > WORLD BANK CHIEF: HARD TO KNOW WHAT [outcome]WILL HAPPEN IN EGYPT, + ME Region.

* SAME > EL-BARADEI: DEMOCRATIC EGYPT WILL NOT BE THREAT TO EGYPT [or the USA].

* SAME > ANALYST: UNITED STATES HUMILIATED MUBARAK. POTUS Bammer's demand for Mubarak to resign ASAP.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-02-03 02:23  

#1  I'm with Donald Trump on this one.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-02-03 01:52  

00:00