You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
If you have no shame....
2011-03-22
Just imagine, the individual who marginalized nearly half of Iraq's population, and who during his ongoing period of rule saw the Christians driven out of their own country and harassed, is now describing the Arab Gulf states as tyrannical and is attacking them!

Just imagine the person who came [to power] on the back of an American tank, and whose term in office as Prime Minister was renewed for him despite losing the elections, and whose people came out and demonstrated on the day they regretted merely voting for him, is now talking about democracy and freedoms!

Just imagine this; during his time in power more Iraqis were killed than during the Saddam Hussein era and all his wars and he is now talking about rights and justice?

Just imagine that the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al Maliki, whose term was renewed based on Iranian-US approval and whose government killed approximately 14 anti-government protesters a few days ago, is now attacking the Arab Gulf states on the pretext of defending the Shia of Bahrain and is giving lectures on freedom and democracy and talking about the winds of change. Can anything be more ironic than this? How can Nuri al Maliki be the Prime Minister to the whole of Iraq, with all its Sunnis, Shia, Christians and other components, whilst using the same language as Mahmoud Short Round Ahmadinejad or Hassan Nasrallah? We have written so much on the sectarianism of the Iraqi government and its subordination to Iran and we were told that we were exaggerating. And now we have the Arabs, the people of the Gulf in particular, and of course the Iraqis before them, dumbstruck at what al Maliki and others like him, such as Moqtada al Sadr who lives in Iran and Ahmed al Chalabi, one of the most prominent figures of the US occupation of Iraq, do and say. How can people of this sectarian mindset be guardians of the various components of the Iraqi nation?

When al Maliki attacks the Gulf States and their leaders he is confirming one fact to us; that the current sectarian Iraqi regime is not democratic. He is also confirming that this regime will not last at all in this extreme form as Iraq does not belong to the Shia or to any one sect and nor should it. Rather, al Maliki's attack will isolate the Iraqi regime and it has no future with this kind of logic unless it wants to be like Hezbullies, which also has no future. But there is one very important point to which we must pay attention; we are fortunate that all the cards have been revealed and the game has become clear today.

The lie that is the democracy of Iraq can no longer continue and it cannot be said that Storied Baghdad has returned as an active member on the Arab scene; rather, Iraq has become an active member in the process of the exportation of the Iranian project in the region.

This is not a Sunni-Shia issue, but rather an issue of who believes in the homeland and who believes in the Wali al Faqih [Guardian Jurist] and there is a big difference between the two. Therefore, we are fortunate today that the process of separating [the two] has taken place with very clear results and has happened faster than we thought as this helps us to know who Iran's agents are and to know who are truly eager for their own homelands. With regards to al Maliki and others in Storied Baghdad who are attacking the Gulf States, one can only say to them: if you have no shame then do as you please!
Posted by:Fred

#10  "It must be fun as a journalist to write for a be profoundly ignorant readership!"

FTFY, AH.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2011-03-22 23:05  

#9  Pravda MSM
Posted by: Gomez Elmeagum6422   2011-03-22 17:44  

#8  To say Maliki is on par with Saddam

Give him time.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-03-22 14:23  

#7  It's a Sunni-Shiite thing. You wouldn't understand.
Posted by: Oscar Spineck3066   2011-03-22 12:59  

#6  Comparing Maliki to Saddam because security forces fired on a crowd is like saying the invasion of Grenada was worse than Operation Barbarosa. It must be fun as a journalist to write for a profoundly ignorant readership! You can say just about anything.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-03-22 12:35  

#5  Who writes this crap???

Polite estimates say there are between 500,000 and 750,000 bodies in the 1200 or so mass graves throughout Iraq.

Statistical surveys estimate there were over 1.5 million people executed by Saddam, on top of the 1.0 million or so men he fed into the meat grinder with Iran.

Statistical surveys in Baghdad estimate that one in four families in Baghdad had a relative jailed and executed by Saddam.

The totals are hard to come by as millions fled Iraq. The total population of Iraq fell by almost 6.0 million in twenty years between 1980 and 2000.

To say Maliki is on par with Saddam is irresponsible journalism and slander of the worst kind.

Comparing Maliki to Saddam because security forces fired on a crowd is like saying the invasion of Grenada was worse than Operation Barbarosa.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2011-03-22 11:40  

#4  More Iraqis were killed under Maliki than Hussein? I don't think so. Iran War, Gulf War 1, Gulf War 2, Kurdish and Swamp Arab purges - and of course the 'millions' of babies we killed with the sanctions, and then there are the routine killings with the plastic shredder etc. Maliki's no saint but he's still a few laps behind Hussein.
Posted by: Glenmore   2011-03-22 07:40  

#3  And yet, phil_b, the author seems to think the Iraqis should rise above their tribal origins and seek a nationalistic unity. It's a nice daydream.
Posted by: Bobby   2011-03-22 06:42  

#2  islam is such a "colorful" religion.

Oh, and by the way, is (or was) KaDaffy a Sunni or a Shia or just an Al-Goombah.
And send the man selling peanuts over... I have some spare change.
Posted by: Dribble2716   2011-03-22 04:51  

#1  It's easy to forget that Iraq is now a Shiia run state and as such will be the protector of the Arab Shiia.
Posted by: phil_b   2011-03-22 02:55  

00:00