You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Nobel Committee asked to strip Obama of Peace Prize
2011-03-22
The Bolivian President and a Russian political leader have launched a campaign to revoke Obama's honour after the US attacked Libya.

Liberal Democratic Party of Russia leader and Vice-Chairman of the State Duma Vladimir Zhirinovsky released a statement today calling for the Nobel Prize Committee to take back the honour bestowed on US President Barack Obama in 2009. Zhirinovsky said the attacks were "another outrageous act of aggression by NATO forces and, in particular, the United States," and that the attacks demonstrated a "colonial policy" with "one goal: to establish control over Libyan oil and the Libyan regime." He said the prize was now hypocritical as a result.

Bolivian President Evo Morales echoed the call: "How is it possible that a Nobel Peace Prize winner leads a gang to attack and invade? This is not a defence of human rights or self-determination."

Morales won the Gaddafi International Prize for Human Rights in 2006.
And what would you rather have, a Nobel or a Gaddafi?
He is amongst a number of left-leaning Latin American leaders who have denounced the attacks against Libya. Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, Rafael Correa of Ecuador, Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua and Cristina Ferdinez of Argentina have all criticised western media coverage of the Libyan crisis.

Morales and Chavez repeated calls for peace talks with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples." The Committee praised the "change in the international climate" affected by Obama's presidency.

In his Nobel Lecture, he discussed the "hard truth" of the inevitability of war, saying: "There will be times when nations -- acting individually or in concert -- will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified."

A message has been widely retweeted on Twitter today: "Obama has now fired more cruise missiles than all other Nobel Peace prize winners combined."
Posted by:tipper

#13  I'll order more popcorn. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2011-03-22 23:07  

#12  No big deal, you can get one in boxes of cereal now.
Posted by: CincinnatusChili   2011-03-22 17:41  

#11  But, but, taking it back would suggest that the Nobel Peas Prize is politically motivated, and not based on actual accomplishment.
Posted by: gorb   2011-03-22 15:15  

#10  yes, there is buyer's remorse. Life long democrats are jumping ship. And yes, Obummer should be stripped of his nobel peace prize.
Posted by: Fi   2011-03-22 14:44  

#9  Gaddafi International Prize for Human Rights

Ebayed ?
Posted by: Oscar   2011-03-22 14:38  

#8  And award it to Kadaffy for bringing eternal peace to so many fellow Muslims.
Posted by: Oscar Spineck3066   2011-03-22 13:04  

#7  The comedy just writes itself.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge    2011-03-22 12:36  

#6  Wake me if the committee actually gets a fucking clue.
Posted by: DarthVader   2011-03-22 11:53  

#5  I don't understand. He only just got his hands bloody enough to *qualify* for the Peace Prize.
Posted by: Jock the Salmon   2011-03-22 11:46  

#4  Do I sense some "buyer's remorse" amongst the liberals?
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-03-22 09:51  

#3  Yep, right after the NYT returns Duranty's Pulitzer. Short of that, how about firing the asshats who gave it in the first place 'pour encourager les autres'. Serious quality control problems with the program guys.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-03-22 08:54  

#2  That's what they get, the Nobel boys, for awarding an empty suit. They must be shocked!
Posted by: Bobby   2011-03-22 06:49  

#1  OOooh, I love it, Nothing stings like an award taken away.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2011-03-22 05:53  

00:00