You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
US deliberately giving Gadaffy time to tighten grip – President of Libyan Constitutional Union
2011-03-26
[Asharq al-Aswat] The president of the Libyan Constitutional Union, Mohamed Ben Ghalbon, which opposes the Qadaffy regime, has expressed his doubts about the nature of the military operations being carried out by the international coalition forces in Libya. In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Ben Ghalbon said "I fear that the Americans are deliberately giving Qadaffy sufficient time to tighten his grip on all of western Libya, giving him control of a third of Libya, namely the Tripoli region as well as the Fezzan region (which did not rise up against him). This means that Qadaffy is in control of most of Libya's oil after he recovered Ras Lanuf and Brega [from the rebels]." He added "Cyrenaica has divided itself from him [Qadaffy], with European help, but this region has the least oil wealth and that is why he does not consider it a priority."

Ben Ghalbon added "God only knows how long this will see Libya divided, during which Brega will require European protection from Qadaffy and his military attempts to regain control of this city. This will leave the US forces free to carry out a number of operations."

Ben Ghalbon also clarified to Asharq Al-Awsat that when the coalition force imposed the no-fly zone above Libya, after obtaining international and legal approval to do so, they divided the military mission against themselves. This saw, for example, British and French air forces covering eastern Libya, namely Cyrenaica, whilst US air force covered western Libya. Ben Ghalbon stressed that it was the speedy French intervention which broke Qadaffy's siege of Benghazi. At the time, Benghazi was the last rebel stronghold in Libya, and was surrounded by Qadaffy tanks, and would certainly have fallen to Qadaffy forces had the European air forces not intervened.

Ben Ghalbon told Asharq Al-Awsat "after a few more hours of tank bombardment, the Qadaffy forces could have entered Benghazi, and they would have destroyed the city and hung hundreds of revolutionaries in the city's public squares, as this is the nature of the Qadaffy regime in dealing with its opponents, and this is what happened in 1976, and 1984. That is until the European intervention prioritized aiding the city [of Benghazi] and saving its inhabitants, putting this above the destruction of Qadaffy's air defense, and this is something that confirmed the good intentions of the Europeans and the effectiveness of their aid."

However he added "the situation in the Tripoli region was, and continues to be, different, as the US aircraft and missiles are engaged in targeting air bases under the pretext of disrupting Qadaffy's air defense, whilst they also struck some insignificant targets in the city of Tripoli, abandoning the towns of Misrata and Zentan to face intensive tank bombardment from the Qadaffy forces...despite the calls from the peoples of these two cities for help."

Ben Ghalbon told Asharq Al-Awsat that "the entire world was aware what the fate of the rebels in these cities would be if the regime's forces were able to gain control, however apparently rescuing them was not one of America's priorities, for they did not turn to this [mission] until after they had completed their objectives and struck Qadaffy's air defenses."
Posted by:Fred

#7  "Libyan Constitutional Union"?

Why do I think the only part of the name that makes any sense is 'Libyan'? And perhaps not even that?
Posted by: Steve White   2011-03-26 14:52  

#6  Hey, we must know with whom we are in the fight club with here. We bent over backwards to help these people because the US are decent people and do not like to see anyone slaughtered, but critique coming from a lead haji will not be tolerated by me.
Posted by: newc   2011-03-26 14:29  

#5  I stopped reading when I reached "Mohamed" in the first sentence.

Posted by: Besoeker   2011-03-26 14:17  

#4  They haven't even won, and they're starting to give us an idea of their real feelings vis-a-vis Uncle Sam. It's kind of funny that we're spending billions of dollars to replace one anti-American regime with another one.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-03-26 14:10  

#3  Goodness, newc - don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel. ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2011-03-26 14:07  

#2  Shaddup you fu**ing haji. The US should have let Gadaffi wipe ALL of you out Amalek. You were the A-holes putting holes in our Soldiers in Iraq. Your criticism is something that makes me feel that NONE of you are worth an ants dung in the Middle East. Your punk ass is the one that decided to start a war on your leader with no plan, and the US did what it could. If I hear one breath of this again from you foolish false prophet worshiping idiots, I would engage in talk of wiping you all out. Now move out and draw fire and get your country so we can go back to adult matters here.
Posted by: newc   2011-03-26 12:37  

#1  Everyone's a critic.
Posted by: Pappy   2011-03-26 10:05  

00:00