You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Obama Hopes to Hit Up Big Donors - for a Change
2011-04-03
Somebody said the Trunks need somebody who can raise big money. Front-page WaPo:
Facing an energized Republican Party and deep-pocketed conservative groups, President Obama is kicking off his 2012 reelection campaign with a concerted push for help from wealthy donors and liberal groups unbound by spending limits.
Trunk money will get spread among a half a dozen hopefuls, while Dim cash will go to one - or two.
The strategy - which could begin in earnest as early as Monday with the formation of an official presidential committee - suggests a notable shift in emphasis for a president who has long decried the outsize role of money in politics.
Looks different from the inside, eh?
Obama frequently points with pride to the role that smaller donors played in his 2008 election, when his campaign also openly discouraged spending by outside organizations.
Is Soros an "organization"?
But now Obama finds himself seeking out the kind of big-money donations he has often criticized while encouraging independent groups to raise and spend unlimited money on his behalf.

Democratic strategists say the aggressive fundraising goals are aimed in part at intimidating Republican rivals, who bested Democrats in overall political spending in 2010.
Or maybe the WaPo is starting a rumor to influence Trunk donors?
[In 2008] Obama also formed a group of "bundlers" who collected checks from their friends and earned special access to him and his staff, just as previous candidates of both parties had done before, and he declined public financing to avoid spending limits.
Might that work in reverse? Say a big, formerly Jewish, eastern European billionaire spreads around a bunch of cash with the understanding that it goes to a certain candidate?
[However ...] The 2012 campaign will lack the combination of factors that animated the 2008 contest: a fresh-faced candidate who could be the first black president; polarizing opponents like Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sarah Palin; and the eagerness of Democrats to end Republican control of the White House.
Posted by:Bobby

#6  It seems that the older you get the more contrast you perceive. The way things should be and the reality of what they are is disturbing. We the people no longer. A glimmer of hope is the Tea Party.

Posted by: Dale   2011-04-03 18:32  

#5  Republican Party and deep-pocketed conservative groups

Ignoring the long record of the Donk Party [recipient of mandatory payroll deductions of close shop union dues] and the deep-pocketed left wing groups that have historically beaten out Trunk cash collections.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-04-03 18:26  

#4  Good grief, somehow I screwed up pasting the link to the Snopes letter. If one of our Mods wants to tweak it I'll be grateful...
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2011-04-03 16:25  

#3  Dale - Good letter that states in one place what most Burgers feel about Ogabe. Here's the linky.

For me, the money quote's at the very end: "Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term, I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years."
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2011-04-03 16:23  

#2  would be nice if he restricted himself to legal donations by Americans this time
Posted by: Frank G   2011-04-03 15:38  

#1  I just got this today;

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/youscareme.asp

Open letter that the Times would not publish.
Mr Pritchett
Posted by: Dale   2011-04-03 15:35  

00:00