| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| US pushes Iraq to decide on troop extension |
| 2011-04-08 |
| BAGHDAD - Months before the United States is due to complete its withdrawal from Iraq, Washington is stepping up pressure on Iraqi leaders to decide whether US troops should stay to help fend off a still-potent insurgency. US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, speaking ahead of meetings with Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and other Iraqi leaders during a visit to Baghdad, said the United States would be willing to consider extending the US military presence in Iraq beyond the end of this year. A bilateral security pact requires Washington to withdraw its remaining force of around 47,000 troops by year’s end. “If folks here are going to want us to have a presence we’re going to need to get on with it pretty quickly in terms of our planning and our ability to figure out where we get the forces, what kind of forces we need here and what specifically the mission they want us to do,” Gates told troops on a sprawling US base next to Baghdad airport. “I think there is interest in having a continuing presence, but the politics are such that we’ll just have to wait and see because the initiative ultimately has to come from the Iraqis.” More than eight years after the US-led invasion to oust Saddam Hussein, Iraq is struggling to halt violence from a weakened but still lethal Islamist insurgency and to put an end to a long period of political instability following general elections more than a year ago. A statement on Maliki’s website said the prime minister had told Gates that “our armed forces in the military and police have the power to confront any attack, and their capabilities to impose security and stability increase day by day”. It did not say whether an extended US presence would be requested. US officials have said they expect to accelerate the removal of remaining US troops, which mostly focus on training their Iraqi counterparts, in the late summer or fall so that, barring a deal to extend the US presence, the entire force can be removed by the end of the year. The United States has also been dismantling bases, removing equipment and handing over facilities to Iraqi forces. General Lloyd Austin, who commands US forces in Iraq, told reporters he had not yet made a recommendation to the White House on how many troops would stay if such a deal is struck. But he said there might be a drop-dead point after which it would be too expensive or difficult to keep troops in Iraq, or send them back once they have left. “The clock is ticking,” he said. “We will reach a point ... where it will be very difficult to recreate things that we’ve disassembled.” “You can do anything but it costs more money and more resources and, quite frankly, our country right now as you know is not interested in having to expend more resources because we wasted an opportunity.” Austin said political wrangling that preceded the formation of Maliki’s new government in December, and the continuing lack of new interior and defence ministers, had contributed to Iraq’s failure to decide whether to ask for a troop extension. Even more instrumental, however, may be the political pressure that Maliki faces within his tenuous Shia-led coalition government, which was formed only after Maliki made a deal with Moqtada al-Sadr, the anti-American cleric who opposes the presence of US troops on Iraqi soil. |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #4 Iraq has less than a year. Make a decision. |
| Posted by: newc 2011-04-08 22:50 |
| #3 Its a big question. There is a considered attempt to create instability, whether religious by church massacre, social with the targeted assassinations, or government with that well conducted assault on the government building the other day. If all they need to make it are a couple more years of training and advising with some quick reaction teams available in case the toothless fairy and friends pop up, plus presence during this jazzman revolution shakeup... All coalition troops who were involved performed above and beyond all realistic expectations and those who disagree are damn fools or liars. I'm sure they are ready to get on with their lives, dunno, any opinions by those involved? I just hope Gates took into account that obama is not really known to get down to brass tacks himself. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2011-04-08 18:17 |
| #2 I just don't see how Obama can appease his leftist voters without a full & final Iraq withdrawal. I expect some conservatives (the ones with brains) will be pleased as well. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2011-04-08 02:41 |
| #1 I just don't see how Obama can appease his leftist voters without a full & final Iraq withdrawal. (Especially after he broke his word on Guantanamo, did a surge in Afghanistan, & bombed Libya...) |
| Posted by: American Delight 2011-04-08 02:02 |