You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
James Hansen Again Vies For Lord Of The Flies Role
2011-05-11
James Hansen,who runs NASA’s Goddard Institute, is currently backing a lawsuit against the administration for failing to address global warming — and is using teenagers to do it.

The federal government has violated its legal obligation to protect the atmosphere as a resource that belongs to everyone, according to a lawsuit filed in federal court last week.

Five of the plaintiffs are teenagers, who have a “profound interest in ensuring our climate remains stable enough to ensure their right to a livable future,” according to the suit filed May 4, which names a number of federal officials — from Lisa Jackson, head of the Environmental Protection Agency, to Robert Gates of the Defense Department — as defendants.

The suit cites climate calculations, and is supported by NASA climate scientist James Hansen, who has a history of speaking out forcefully on the hazards of human-caused global warming. Hansen told LiveScience he had been interested in going to court over the topic in recent years.


The angle to this nonsense is that because Obama can no longer deliver the goods, the radicals want to use the courts to tyrannically impose what representative government wonÂ’t. Helped, of course, by the administration putting up little or no defense against their lawsuits.

That’s also why want courts to grant nature “human rights.”

That would allow activists to flood courts with actions demanding that judges impose policies that legislators refuse to pass, an anti-democratic impulse that would put public policy in the hands of star chamber "environment courts" rather than elected representatives of the people.

And that way, they wouldnÂ’t have to borrow teenagers as plaintiffs, but instead adopt rocks, plants, and rivers.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#6  minize minimize
Posted by: Tarzan Angeng5589   2011-05-11 17:32  

#5  Cutting CO2 emissions might minize anthropogenic changes in earth's climate but there's no way it could 'stabilize' the climate which has been changing for over 4 billion years.

The climate might change in a different way without human CO2 emissions, but change it will.
Posted by: Tarzan Angeng5589   2011-05-11 17:31  

#4  Don't forget private profit but socialized losses That kind of fits under 'rent-seeking' although it has elements of 'regulatory capture.'
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-05-11 13:01  

#3  Don't forget private profit but socialized losses
Posted by: Hellfish   2011-05-11 12:23  

#2  So many tools of tyranny

  • Media brainwashing

  • Lawfare

  • Court rule by fiat

  • Rent-seeking

  • Corporate immunity


What to do, what to do...
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-05-11 12:18  

#1  Were I the judge sitting this case, my first question to the youths involved would be, "What have you done to reduce your footprint? How many trees have you planted, have you given up gasoline-powered transportation, significantly reduced your home's energy use, gone locavore, recycled, built a compost heap..." If the complainant has not taken steps to significantly reduce his own impact, he has no right to seek the court's authority to compel others to do so.
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-05-11 11:01  

00:00