You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Paks Retake Naval Base After Attack
2011-05-23
Pakistani commandos have regained control of a naval base after more than 17 hours of fighting with Taliban gunmen, in an attack that raised questions about Pakistan's ability to defend itself from terrorists fourth-graders anyone militants.

Pakistan's Interior Minister Rehman Malik said Monday that 10 security personnel and 14 others were wounded in the brazen attack on the base in the southern port city of Karachi. He said four to six heavily armed terrorists militants dressed in black used ladders to climb into the base late Sunday, setting off intense gunbattles and several explosions. Malik said four terrorists attackers were killed but two terrorists may have escaped.

A Taliban terrorist spokesman said the attack was launched to avenge the death of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, who was killed by U.S. special forces in a raid on May 2 in Pakistan.

Interior Minister Malik said six Americans and 11 Chinese contractors were on the base at the time of the attack and had been evacuated safely. Two P3C maritime surveillance airplanes were destroyed. The planes were recently given to Pakistan by the United States.
Posted by:tu3031

#10  As for allegations that PAK AF Airmen were sabotaging their own US-supplied F-16's, it may be related to ...

To wit,

* DEFENCE FORUM INDIA > CHINA AGREES TO GIVE J-20/FC-20 FIFTH GENERATION STEALTH FIGHTERS TO PAKISTAN.

However ...

* INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > PAKISTAN CANNOT SELL
[SIno-Pak produced] JF-17's FOR TEN YEARS.

* SAME > PAKISTAN ASKED CHINA TO INDUCT THE JF-17 INTO PLA, as per the above Artic in order to make PAK mass-produced versions saleable on the international warplane markets.

However, again, because China has a long history of preferring [USSR-style]inter-State econ barter to cash assistance, ECON-TROUBLED PAKISTAN RISKS BEING ON ITS OWN TO UNILATER ABSORB THE BULK [all?] OF THE JF-17'S DEVELOPMENT + PRODUCTION COSTS???

IOW, MUSLIM PAKISTAN GETS STUCK WID A HANDFUL OR SMALL NUMBER OF NEXT-GENERATION ADVANCED FIGHTERS, WHOSE UPKEEP + MAINTENANCE IT MAY OR MAY NOT BE ABLE TO $$$ AFFORD WID OR WIDOUT CHINA, AS RELATIVE TO PAK-PERCEIVED WILY DASTARDLY HISTORICAL FOE HINDU INDIA???

E.G. DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > PAKISTAN WILL [have to] [militarily?]RESPOND IFF US DRONE STRIKES DON'T STOP: ISI CHIEF [LTG. Ahmed Pasha].

* DAWN.COM > EXPERTS WARN GOVT. OF FAMINE THREAT IN PAKISTAN. National Sovereignty = Security linked to FOOD SECURITY, espec iff Islamabad Politicos hope to prevent USSR-style collapse = post-USSR Russia geopol weakness.

[CHINA'S problematic "THREE GORGES" DAM here].

Iff Pakistan is expecting serious Regional, Global geopol troubles 2011-2020/2025 ["perfect storm"], then given their country's steadily worsening econ woes it behooves Islamabad + Pak Armed Forces to diversify their resources for thier own effec National Security.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-05-24 00:12  

#9  DEFENCE FORUM OF INDIA > US SAYS PAKISTAN MODIFIED [Harpoon NLCMS] TO STRIKE INDIA, in Land Attack missions + besides also the US-supplied P-3's for same.

IOW, THE TALIBAN MAY HAD IRONICALLY JUST SAVED INDJUH'S B *** FROM SOME FUTURE TROUBLE???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-05-23 23:36  

#8  Probably indicates how deep the rot (islamization of the military) has set in

More than "probably".
Posted by: Pappy   2011-05-23 22:19  

#7  whether they put up a tough fight or not it still took 17 hrs. for COMMANDOS too get them? And they talk all that shit about attacking our SEAL teams if they ever try another Bin laden move again.
Posted by: chris   2011-05-23 18:30  

#6  whether they put up a tough fight or not it still took 17 hrs. for COMMANDOS too get them? And they talk all that shit about attacking our SEAL teams if they ever try another Bin laden move again.
Posted by: chris   2011-05-23 18:30  

#5  This base is the HQ for their Navy commandos.
Probably indicates how deep the rot (islamization of the military) has set in.
Posted by: john frum   2011-05-23 17:40  

#4  I would suppose artillary etc. was used sparingly if at all.

Quite a little raid, got 2 P3C's and headlines.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-05-23 17:21  

#3  Six gomers, and it took you 17 hours to find and kill four of them?

You would be surprised where people can lay up, even in one building. Especially if someone had provided the attackers with advance information.
Posted by: pappy   2011-05-23 17:06  

#2  Six gomers, and it took you 17 hours to find and kill four of them? On a military base?

In the immortal words of Jed Clampett: "Pityfull. Jes' pityfull."
Posted by: mojo   2011-05-23 15:57  

#1  17 hours? Geez. What if they attacked the nuke installation?
Posted by: newc   2011-05-23 15:23  

00:00