You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Karzai bans NATO strikes on Afghan homes
2011-06-01
[Al Jazeera] [Al Jazeera] Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai
... A former Baltimore restaurateur, now 12th and current President of Afghanistan, displacing the legitimate president Rabbani in December 2004. He was installed as the dominant political figure after the removal of the Taliban regime in late 2001 in a vain attempt to put a Pashtun face on the successor state to the Taliban. After the 2004 presidential election, he was declared president regardless of what the actual vote count was. He won a second, even more dubious, five-year-term after the 2009 presidential election. His grip on reality has been slipping steadily since around 2007, probably from heavy drug use...
, the Afghan president, has warned that the NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the style of the American pants...
forces fighting in his country risk becoming an "occupying force" if they do not stop air strikes on Afghan civilian homes as they hunt armed fighters.

On Tuesday, Karzai told news hounds in Kabul that "from this moment, air strikes on the houses of people are not allowed.

"The people of Afghanistan so far have endured casualties and have given sacrifices. So these operations should not be used against Afghan people and their houses. That's why bombing Afghan houses is banned."

The president's outspoken remarks came days after he issued a "last warning" to foreign forces over civilian casualties following Saturday's killingof 14 civilians, including women and kiddies in an air strike.

NATO apology
NATO's US-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) later apologised over the incident in the restive southern province of Helmand.

"If after the Afghan government said the aerial bombing of Afghan houses is banned and if it continues, then their presence will change from a war against terrorism to an occupying force," Karzai added.

"And in that case, Afghan history is witness to how the Afghans deal with occupying forces," he said, making apparent reference to the historic defeats of foreign invasions, including that of the Soviet Union, which invaded Afghanistan in 1979 and withdrew 10 years later.
No problem. We can leave now. You remember Najibullah, don't you?
It was the president's strongest statement against the air strikes, which NATO says are a necessary weapon in the war against the Taliban insurgency.

NATO says it never conducts such strikes without Afghan government co-ordination and approval. NATO officials could not immediately be reached for comment on Karzai's statement.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Win this thing? Sorry TW, the good General, whom I admire a great deal, is talking through his hat. What does win mean? I've never heard any definition. We are not going to change this society in any meaningful way. Hows about we say WE WON since we killed OBL. That way, we have a wonderful reason to leave this rat hole and the illiterates that inhabit it to their own devices.
Posted by: remoteman   2011-06-01 22:20  

#8  General Petraeus and his team seem to believe we can win this thing. I'm inclined to give him some more time over there.
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-06-01 21:17  

#7  Karzai's brother controls much of the Heroin trade in the afghan-dog's-breakfast. Karzai's sovereignty rests in his shoes (never mind the islamo-hat and sudden-third-worlder costume).

Time to pull a "Diem."
Posted by: Uleper the Batty8564   2011-06-01 19:15  

#6  Karzai doesn't get it. We are an occupying force. We conquered that piss ant little country because the Taliban were harboring the al Qaeda terrorists who attacked us on 9/11. The Afghan people are paying the price for that. Let other piss ant nations take notice. Civilians, Talibunnies-in-training, gun molls, human shields or whoever they were in those houses should have known what was gonna happen. They should have run like hell.

Karzai may call himself a president but that's only because we let him. He is really just a puppet and he damned well better learn who's pulling the strings. If he doesn't, I'm thinking NATO could bomb his little presidential palace and say our intelligence indicated the presence of Taliban in that structure.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-06-01 13:36  

#5  What about barns and outhouses?
Posted by: mojo   2011-06-01 13:08  

#4  Afghan history is witness to how the Afghans deal with occupying forces except for jihadis, whom Afghans will generally love and support to the death. Due to its very rough neighborhood, A-stan can't be contained easily.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-06-01 11:24  

#3  As far as I can tell, this bombing of Afghan homes is the same as most previous such 'atrocities' - our forces were returning fire. In fact, don't ROE stipulate that we cannot even return fire if we reasonably suspect civilian presence? You can't fight a war this way. Get the f*** out.
Posted by: Glenmore   2011-06-01 08:43  

#2  we need to publicly announce, then remove, all security measures protecting Karzai and his cronies. Let them die in Tali-attacks
Posted by: Frank G   2011-06-01 08:06  

#1  AFGHAN HAMID, versus PAK HAMID ....

To wit,

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [Video] GENERAL HAMID GUL: US WILL START WORLD WAR III IFF WAR IS EXPANDED INTO PAKISTAN [ME-style "Arab Spring" more appealing/interesting to ordinary Pakis than Al-Qaeda + Hard Boyz].

D *** NG IT, THERE ARE "HAMIDS" JUST EVERYWHERE TODAY!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-06-01 03:14  

00:00