You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Australian police can remove the veil
2011-07-06
The New South Wales government has pushed through legislation allowing police to force the removal of head coverings to identify suspected criminals. The laws, among the toughest in the world involving Muslim female attire, follow the recent row over a Sydney woman who claimed police tried to tear off her veil after her car was pulled over.

The woman, Carnita Matthews, was charged with falsely accusing police of assault. She was cleared by a judge who concluded she could not be positively identified because of her head covering.

Under new laws, approved by the state cabinet and due to be enforced soon, anyone who refuses to remove a head covering for police will face up to a year in jail or a $5,570 fine.

Barry O'Farrell, the premier of New South Wales, said, "I don't care whether a person is wearing a motorcycle helmet, a niqab, a face veil or anything else, the police should be allowed to require those people to make their identification clear."

Many Muslim groups accepted the changes but some said a female officer should oversee any removals. The Muslim Women's Association said if a female officer supervised the removals then "nobody could really complain".

Hizb ut-Tahrir, which called for Australian Muslims this week to repudiate democracy, said the new laws were designed to intimidate Muslims. The laws were rejected by civil liberties groups as well.

More Australian states may adopt similar laws, with the Western Australian government indicating that it would consider the NSW legislation.
Posted by:

#2  First Dutch, now Aussies...am I sensing a trend?
Posted by: Skidmark   2011-07-06 02:26  

#1  ION AUS = OZ, PEOPLE'S DAILY FORUMS > AUSTRALIA, US NEVER TALK ABOUT BASING US TROOPS IN AUSTRALIA.

America would like to expand Bilateral Cooper + its influence or interests as per Ozzie Defense-Security Planning + Requirements, but preferably widout any need to permanently base US Troops, Planes, or Ships there.

* SAME > CHINA, JAPAN TRADE WORDS [again] OVER THE DAOYUS [Senkakus], as per China-alleged
"illegal" activities by Japanese fishing boats.

INTERESTING > ARTIC = includes a MAP showing general area of Southern Japan, Okinawa, Okin Islands, + Taiwan, BUT WIDOUT ANY SPECIFIC LABEL OR NAME DEPICTING WHICH SMALL ISLANDS BETWEEN OKINAWA + TAIWAN IS THE DAOYUS OR DAOYUS AREA PER SE.

Iff I were to speculate, I would say that China via the Artic is attempting to lay subtle sovereign claim to the whole of the Map = entire East China Sea includ Seas of Japan, Korea, + Taiwan widout actually saying or labeling as such???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-07-06 02:04  

00:00