You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
US suspends some Pakistan military aid
2011-07-11
The United States is holding back some military aid to Pakistain, President Barack B.O. Obama's chief of staff confirmed Sunday, after a New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
report said $800 million was being withheld.

"They've taken some steps that have given us reason to pause on some of the aid which we're giving to the military, and we're trying to work through that," William Daley told ABC's "This Week with Ace newshound Christiane Amanpour."

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
... sometimes described as the Smartest Woman in the World and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Henry Clay ...
had warned last month that the United States could slow down US military aid to Pakistain unless it took unspecified steps to help the United States.

There has been increasing pressure in Washington on the B.O. regime Washington, which provided $2.7 billion in security assistance last year to Islamabad, to hold back on aid.

Growing concerns over collusion with beturbanned goon groups since it emerged in early May that al Qaeda leader the late Osama bin Laden
... who no longer has to waste time and energy breathing...
was hiding out in a garrison city near Islamabad has been compounded by recent accusations that Pakistain's intelligence services approved a journalist's killing.

According to The New York Times, about $800 million in military aid and equipment, or over one-third of the more than $2 billion in annual US security assistance to Pakistain, could be affected by the suspension.

Asked by ABC about the report, Daley did not dispute the figures and confirmed that some military aid was now being withheld.

"The truth of the matter is, our relationship with Pakistain is very complicated," he said.

"Obviously there's still a lot of pain that the political system in Pakistain is feeling by virtue of the raid that we did to get Osama bin Laden.

Something that the president felt strongly about. We have no regrets over.

"The Pak relationship is difficult, but it must be made to work over time. But until we get through these difficulties, we'll hold back some of the money that the American taxpayers have committed to give." The New York Times said the suspended aid included about $300 million to reimburse Pakistain for some of the costs of deploying more than 100,000 soldiers along the Afghan border, as well as hundreds of millions of dollars in training assistance and military hardware.
Posted by:Fred

#2  * BHARAT RAKSHAK > LESS US MILITARY AID HARMS [US-Pak Diplomatic]RELATIONS, NOT TSPA, aka Pak Army.

ARTIC > Pert AYESHA SIDDIQUA = Cutbacks in US military aid, while perceived as unlikely to alter the broader Pak anti-Terror strategy, may result in the Pakistan Military + heavily Military-influenced/dominated Pak Govt. to do the opposite of US desires by negotiating wid the Insurgents, not fighting them; Pakistan to no longer be seen as fighting "America's War" - however, be that it may the US recognizes that Pakistan is ECON INSOLVENT + BADLY NEEDS THE US $$$ TO MEET BOTH NATIONAL + ANTI-TERROR, ETC. REQUIREMENTS.

* SAME > EXPERTS: US AID "SNUB' TO PAKISTAN A BLOW TO AMERICA. By America, agz America + agz seemingly its own WOT per on-going anti-Militant AFPAK efforts, espec as related to US strategic
objectives + 2014 withdrawal deadline.

* SAME > US SETS TERMS FOR [Pakistan = Pak Mil]AID RESUMPTION. US seeks better or improved US-Pak cooper/collaboration as per selective categories i.e. Counter-Terrorism, Counter-Insurgency, + INTEL collection-sharing.

* SAME > MADE IN US DISASTER. India must unilaterally prepare itself for any + all possible scenarios, consequences.

* SAME > JUI CHIEF: QUICK EXIT [premature] OF US TROOPS FROM AFGHANISTAN WILL ONCE AGAIN CREATE CONDITIONS FOR [new] CIVIL WAR IN COUNTRY | US TROOPS DRAWDOWN INSUFFICIENT FOR [long-term = effective]AFGHAN + REGIONAL STABILITY.

versus

* SAME > [Pakistan] ISI ASKS CIA TO SIGN FORMAL ACCORD RULING OUT FUTURE ATTACKS INSIDE PAKISTAN.

aka WE-WILL-TAKE-YOUR-LYING-AMER-ASS-TO-THE-UN-IFF YOU-BREAK-THE-AGREEMENT "DO'S + DON'TS", or in the alternate write a strongly worded letter to our BFF China + maybe Russia.

* SAME > PANETTA: ZAWAHIRI HIDING IN FATA, but the real threat as per future Terrops launched agz CONUS stems not from transitional, post-Osama Al-Qaeda, but from AQ-affiliate AQAP [aka AQIY] in Yemen.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [PAK Defense Minister]PAKISTAN THREATENS TO WITHDRAW TROOPS FROM PAK-AFGHAN BORDERS [1100 checkpoints] UNLESS US RESUMES AID.

ARTIC = Amer must + should pay, or pay more than current, iff it wants Pak to fight its war agz peace-loving motherly Muslim Milterrs.

* PAKISTAN DEFENCE FORUM > US MOVES TOWARDS [implementation of] AFGHAN GUERILLA WAR, agz the MilTerrs as led by US-Allied SPECFOR Teams + remnisicient of Vietnam War-era programs.

"Counter-Guerilla" Brush = now Mountain Ops.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-07-11 23:52  

#1  Better to spend that 800 million elsewhere, the PAK army has been getting fat off our taxes.
Posted by: Griting Smith6978   2011-07-11 00:27  

00:00