| Submit your comments on this article |
| Fifth Column |
| 2007: 45 Muslim doctors planned US terror raids |
| 2011-08-05 |
| Found this July 2007 article while looking up info in the Scotland airport attack by Muslim doctors. In the article it references chat room transcripts found on the three "cyber terrorists"' possession regarding US Muslim doctors plotting/bragging of terror attacks in the US. I have heard of no US followup on this. A group of 45 Muslim doctors threatened to use car bombs and rocket grenades in terrorist attacks in the United States during discussions on an extremist internet chat site. Police found details of the discussions on a site run by one of a three-strong "cyber-terrorist" gang. They were discovered at the home of Younis Tsouli, 23, Woolwich Crown Court in south-east London heard. One message read: "We are 45 doctors and we are determined to undertake jihad and take the battle inside America. "The first target which will be penetrated by nine brothers is the naval base which gives shelter to the ship Kennedy." This is thought to have been a reference to the USS John F Kennedy, which is often at Mayport Naval Base in Jacksonville, Florida. The message discussed targets at the base, adding: "These are clubs for naked women which are opposite the First and Third units." It also referred to using six Chevrolet GT vehicles and three fishing boats and blowing up petrol tanks with rocket propelled grenades. Investigators have found no link between the Tsouli chat room and the group of doctors and medics currently in custody over attempted car bomb attacks in London and Glasgow. However, sources said it was "definitely spooky" that the use of doctors for terrorist purposes was being discussed in jihadi terrorist circles up to three years ago. Part of the inquiry into the London and Glasgow incidents will focus on whether al-Qa'eda has recruited doctors or other medical professionals because they are less likely to attract suspicion and can move easily around the western world. The three "cyber terrorists" - a British national and two who had been given the right to live in Britain - are facing lengthy jail sentences after admitting using the internet to spread al-Qa'eda propaganda inciting Muslims to a violent holy war and to murder non-believers. They had close links with al-Qa'eda in Iraq and believed they had to fight jihad against a global conspiracy by kuffars, or non-believers, to wipe out Islam. The three are the first defendants in Britain to be convicted of inciting terrorist murder on the internet. They waged cyber-jihad on websites run from their bedrooms. |
| Posted by:Eohippus Phater7165 |
| #6 #5 I did attend a lecture on color-blindness once... Posted by: Steve White loves me them Diversity training. I'd hate to think we'd have any difference in response, unless they be Kufirs |
| Posted by: Frank G 2011-08-05 23:33 |
| #5 I did attend a lecture on color-blindness once... |
| Posted by: Steve White 2011-08-05 22:40 |
| #4 Some would find it strange that a doctor's oath would even mention the subject of renouncing terrorism. But then again, in US med schools, I doubt they teach subjects like red wire/green wire confusion. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2011-08-05 21:29 |
| #3 ‘Whoever kills a person … it is as if he killed all mankind, and whoever saves a life, it is as if he saved the life of all mankind …’ Be wary of the "..." Hereby we take this oath in Thy name, the Creator of all the Heavens and the earth and follow Thy counsel as Thou has revealed to Prophet Mohammad (pbuh). “Whoever killeth a human being, not in liew [sic] of another human being nor because of mischief on earth, it is as if he hath killed all mankind. And if he saveth a human life, he hath saved the life of all mankind.” (Qur’an V/35) That depends on the definition of "innocent". Debbie Schlussel's take: Compared to the other Oaths and Declarations, the Oath of a Muslim Physician appears to be unique in its possibly more conditional nature. The phrase, “not in liew of another human being nor because of mischief on earth,” suggests, licenses, allows or can certainly be interpreted or misinterpreted as to give understanding to a physician taking this Oath and who “killeth a human being,” that the killing is okay as long as it is “in liew of another human being” or “because of mischief on earth.” “Mischief on earth” has also been translated as “corruption” on earth. So who are the corruptors and mischief-makers? We have guidance from some apparent experts: “Non-Muslims ‘cannot be called human beings but are animals who roam the earth and engage in corruption.’ said Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati last week at a ceremony in north-eastern Iran to commemorate the ‘martyrs’ of the Revolutionary Guards and the war against Iraq (1980-88).” “The non-Muslims are [like] those animals that graze, chew their cud, and cause corruption.” |
| Posted by: Eohippus Phater7165 2011-08-05 17:10 |
| #2 IIRC, muslim doctors take a different oath. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2011-08-05 15:58 |
| #1 I guess Hippocratic Oath is just a piece of infidel nonsense. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2011-08-05 14:29 |