You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
NASA Scientist: ManBearPig Space Aliens Might Punish Humans for Global Warming
2011-08-19
H/T Belmont Club
"A preemptive strike would be particularly likely in the early phases of our expansion because a civilisation may become increasingly difficult to destroy as it continues to expand. Humanity may just now be entering the period in which its rapid civilisational expansion could be detected by an ETI because our expansion is changing the composition of the Earth's atmosphere, via greenhouse gas emissions," the report states.
Shouldn't we then accelerate our "civilisational expansion", greenhouse gases be damned? Space colonisation would make us more 'difficult to destroy' as they admit.
"Green" aliens might object to the environmental damage humans have caused on Earth and wipe us out to save the planet. "These scenarios give us reason to limit our growth and reduce our impact on global ecosystems. It would be particularly important for us to limit our emissions of greenhouse gases, since atmospheric composition can be observed from other planets," the authors write.
ManBearPigs Truly 'Green Aliens' would have limited their own growth and thus never have developed any technology that could threaten us over interstellar distances.
Someone is getting desperate here. Watching a TV series jumping the shark may be entertaining in its own way, but the meltdown of once proud institutions is only a sad sight.
Posted by:Shineque Phash6190

#7  ION WORLD NEWS > SUN STORMS "COULD BE MORE DISRUPTIVE WITHIN DECADES".

ARTIC = Generally, LESS SUNSPOTS OR SOLAR ACTIVITY = INCREASED LIKELIHOOD OF HAZARDOUS SOLAR RADIATION BEING RELEASED TOWARDS EARTH.

PERT = Not a question of IFF, BUT "HOW BAD" + "FOR HOW LONG"!? Magnitudes.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-08-20 00:02  

#6  D *** NG IT, IS THAT YOU BACK THERE, DIANE???

Why yes, Virginia, PENN STATE is involved, how did you know???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-08-19 20:39  

#5  To save the economy Krugman style!
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-08-19 19:50  

#4  Which is precisely why so many people were willing to believe NASA officially put out the "report," P2k.
Posted by: Barbara   2011-08-19 19:30  

#3  Don't forget this is the agency that funded Hansen, the MMGW prophet.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-08-19 18:43  

#2  ...the meltdown of once proud institutions is only a sad sight.

Not so fast. The NASA-affiliated author explains himself here. His excuse is that the sun ate his homework, and the dog was in his eyes. I mean! -- NASA didn't fund the study. It was a lark that he did with some friends.

It sounds as if he started it when he was elsewhere, and took up his current job before publication, and it didn't occur to him NOT to put NASA down as his affiliation. (There are procedures for dealing with this circumstance; you'd think he'd have known them.)

Long ago, if you sent out a paper giving NASA as your affiliation, you had to get an in-house peer review. This was true even if it was being sent to a peer-reviewed journal. (In fact, you might have had to have two in-house reviewers, not sure.) If this was not done he might be in trouble with NASA; and if it was done he has nothing to explain.

I'd rant more, but gotta run.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2011-08-19 18:17  

#1  Someone at NASA has lost control of their delusions.
Posted by: DarthVader   2011-08-19 18:00  

00:00