You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
China to keep Pakistan embrace at arm's length
2011-10-05
[Dawn] Pakistain, facing a crisis with the United States, has leaned closely to longtime partner China, offering its "all-weather friendship" with Beijing as an alternative to Washington.

But Pakistain will be disappointed if it hopes to replace American patronage with the same from China.

While China does not welcome the US presence near its border, it wants stability on its western flank and believes an abrupt withdrawal of Washington's support for Pakistain could imperil that.

It also does not want to upset warming relations with India by getting mired in subcontinent security tension.

Maintaining that delicate balance, China will continue supporting economic cooperation with Pakistain but go slow on defence cooperation.

While outwardly all smiles and warm pledges of friendship, China will quietly keep things at arms length.

"I think they see what's going on in the US-Pakistain front at the moment as reason to tread very carefully," said Andrew Small, a researcher at the German Marshall Fund think-tank in Brussels who studies China-Pakistain ties and often visits both countries.

"They are taking extra care to make sure that what's going on in the relationship is correctly understood, not reflecting any willingness to rush in or fill the gap or exploit differences."

Pakistain's brittle relationship with the United States, its major donor, has turned openly rancorous. Washington accused Pakistain's powerful ISI spy agency of directly backing the Afghan Taliban-allied Haqqani network and of providing support for a September 13 attack on the US mission in Kabul.

Pakistain has angrily rejected the accusation and warned the United States that it risked losing an ally if it kept publicly criticizing them over krazed killer groups.

Meanwhile,
...back at the scene of the crime, Lieutenant Queeg had an idea: there was a simple way to tell whether Manetti had been the triggerman -- just look at his shoes!...
as it often does in times of crisis, Pakistain has been trumpeting its ties with China.

Pakistain's Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani
... Pakistain's erstwhile current prime minister, whose occasional feats of mental gymnastics can be awe-inspiring ...
declared Beijing and Islamabad were "true friends and we count on each other" after talks with China's visiting public security minister, Meng Jianzhu.

President Asif Ali President Ten Percent Zardari
... sticky-fingered husband of the late Benazir Bhutto ...
stressed the point last week that Pakistain had other options should its deteriorating relationship with Washington prove beyond repair, and pointedly praised China for its assistance in "stabilizing the situation." Publicly at least, China has gone out of its way to reassure Pakistain.

"Wary Of Offending India"

In May, just weeks after US forces killed the late Osama bin Laden
... who was potted in Pakistain...
on Pak soil, Premier Wen Jiabao
...Wen has a professional background in geology and engineering. Unlike most American politicians, he actually knows things. ...
reassured visiting Gilani of their longstanding friendship and spoke of the "huge sacrifices" Pakistain had made in the global struggle against terrorism.

A Chinese Foreign Ministry front man echoed that line just last week, saying "Pakistain is on the front lines in the fight against terrorism" and China hoped "the relevant countries respect every country's illusory sovereignty and territorial integrity."

But China's assistance also has limits. "The 'all-weather friendship' doesn't mean that all of Pakistain's bills should be paid by us," said Zhao Gancheng, director of South Asia studies at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies.

"China does not have that ability, nor does the US or any other country. It all depends on Pakistain itself."

China regards Pakistain as an important strategic counterweight against its longstanding rival, India, and a hedge against US influence across the region.

It also wants to use Pakistain as a gateway to the Mohammedan world and needs Islamabad's help to combat separatists in its far-western Xinjiang region on their common border.

China is a major supplier of military hardware to Pakistain and also a major investor in areas such as telecommunications, ports and infrastructure.

But China's leaders have no desire to turn that limited stake in Pakistain into a heavy security footprint.

"The partnership is as deep as it needs to be for China," Scott Harold, associate political scientist at the RAND Corporation, said. "They've got what they want diplomatically and economically."

During Meng's visit last week, Beijing bolstered its cooperation with Pakistain, with the signing of $250 million in economic and technical agreements, Zardari's office said.

Many of Beijing's deals with Pakistain have had a strategic payoff in helping to balance US influence in the region.

China invested more than $200 million to help build the deep-sea Gwadar port on Pakistain's Arabian Sea coast, partly with a view to opening an energy and trade corridor from the Gulf, across Pakistain to western China.

China also helped Pakistain build its main nuclear power generation facility at Chashma in Punjab province. Two reactors are in operation and two more are planned.

Analysts say China pointedly agreed to expand the Chashma complex to counter a 2008 nuclear energy deal between India and the United States.

But Beijing appears much less interested in a bilateral defence accord, despite a report by Pakistain media that Islamabad had been secretly lobbying for such an agreement.

"I don't think that's the sort of space that the Chinese want to get into," said Small of the German Marshall Fund. "I don't see why they would suddenly want to be stuck with the liability of Pakistain, particularly vis-a-vis India, given the way Pakistain has behaved in a number of crisis situations."

In each of Pakistain's wars with India, China has been fairly restrained, to the point of being almost neutral.

Analysts say China is wary about tilting the relationship too much in favor of Pakistain, to avoid offending India, with which China wants to develop better economic ties.

Annual two-way trade with India was worth $65.2 billion in 2010, compared with bilateral trade with Pakistain of $8.7 billion, according to Chinese statistics.

Ultimately, Beijing has little to gain from a rift between Islamabad and Washington, experts say.

"If US-Pakistain relations deteriorate, and the region falls into instability, China will not be able to shoulder the responsibility by itself and other regional actors will have a difficult time cooperating to restore stability," said Hu Shisheng, an expert on South Asia at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations think-tank.

"The US still has to be responsible for the stability of this region."
Posted by:Fred

#12  MEMRI.ORG > FORMER PAK ISI CHIEF HAMID GUL: AS MUSLIMS, WE ARE MILITANT BY NATURE; AFGHANISTAN + PAKISTAN, WID CHINA AT THEIR BACK, WILL TOO POWERFUL A BLOC [agz US, India], "ISLAMIC FORCES ARE ALSO MOVING TO CONFRONT INDIA".

ARTIC > GUL = believes ...
> US is making the same historical mistake with the Taliban as it did during the 1980's Soviet pullout from Afghianstan as per asking for then -Afghan Leader-President Najibullah to be part of a post-Soviet Govt. The TALIBAN DEMAND THAT ALL US-NATO FORCES LEAVE THE REGION, NO US-NATO BASES [Sole or Base-sharing] IN-COUNTRY, + THAT THE US DROP ACCUSATIONS THAT THE TALIBAN ENGAGE IN TERRORISM.
> THE TALIBAN WILL NEVER ACCEPT INDIAN = NON-MUSLIM REGIONAL HEGEMONY OER MUSLIM AFPAK, as the US is asking for them to do.
> POST-OSAMA "CORE" AL-QAEDA CHIEF AYMAN ZAWAHIRI MAY HAD LEFT PAK FOR YEMEN???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-10-05 23:56  

#11  Nah, I read the small print at the bottom of the screen that said "Do not attempt at home. Done by professionals on a closed course."
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-10-05 23:41  

#10  wait. what? This happened to you guys too?
Posted by: Frank G   2011-10-05 22:17  

#9  Yep, got to watch out for those cooties.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-10-05 22:12  

#8  It's kinda sorta like when a stripper has a fight with her boyfriend and wants to sleep on your couch.

As long as she ponies up for the steam cleaning when she leaves.
Posted by: badanov   2011-10-05 22:09  

#7  It's kinda sorta like when a stripper has a fight with her boyfriend and wants to sleep on your couch. There may be some short-term advantages, but you know it is not going to last, and not likely to end well.
Posted by: SteveS   2011-10-05 22:03  

#6  There's also the issue of the Pakis being a nest of vipers that cannot be trusted to avoid attacking China, much as they conspired with al Qaeda and the Taliban to stage 9/11, despite decades of American civilian and military aid.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-10-05 16:58  

#5  Let's say the Pakis stage another mass casualty event, but instead of killing a few hundred people, they end up killing tens of thousands. Why would China want to be on the hook for defending Pakistan, during the ensuing Indian attacks on Pakistan? What if everybody else jumps in on India's side? Bottom line, the asylum inmates that that comprise the vast majority of Pakistan's population won't obey Chinese diktats, and are fundamentally contemptuous of their pork-eating and alcohol-swilling yellow neighbors. And that is why the Chinese will not commit to a mutual defense treaty.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2011-10-05 16:55  

#4  Even more reason to cut the Paks loose.
Posted by: Spot   2011-10-05 08:00  

#3  High-energy plankton?
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-10-05 01:01  

#2  P.U.
Posted by: Creregum Glolump8403   2011-10-05 00:39  

#1  US reports:
Muslim Uighure in NW China (Xinqiang-Uighur province) get support from ... Pakistan:

link
Posted by: vendaval   2011-10-05 00:25  

00:00