You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Court moved against drone attacks
2011-11-06
[Dawn] A petition has been filed in the Beautiful Downtown Peshawar High Court seeking a court order for making public any `secret deal` between the Pakistain and US governments about carrying out drone attacks in the tribal areas.

The Defence of Pakistain Council (DPC) and five other religiopolitical parties moved the court on Friday stating that so far around 277 attacks by the pilotless aircraft had taken place in Pakistain which resulted in killing of 1,680 persons and injuries to 2,634 others.

The petitioners are: DPC through its provincial convener Syed Yousaf Shah, who is also provincial chief of JUI (Samiul Haq group); former deputy speaker of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa
... formerly NWFP, still Terrorism Central...
Assembly Ikramullah Shahid; All Pakistain Abdul Qayyum Khan League; central information secretary of Jamiat Ahl-i-Hadith; Tanzeem-i-Islami, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa; JUI (Nazriyati group); and district president of Ahle Sunnat-wal-Jamaat, Maulana Mohammad Ismail.

The petitioners stated that it was their fundamental right in view of Article 19-A of the Constitution to have access to information in all matters of public importance including any secret deal allowing drone attacks in Pakistain.

The petitioners requested the court to hold that the government was bound to apprise the people of Pakistain about any secret deal and if it was so, it should submit copy of that deal.

They also prayed that the said deal should also be made public in all the leading national and international print and electronic media so that the people of Pakistain may adopt appropriate measures to protect their lives and save their country.

The petitioners stated that in the meantime the government may be directed to produce in court copies of parliamentary resolution in which the public representatives had opposed and condemned the drone attacks and also of any correspondence in this respect with US and NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. A cautionary tale of cost-benefit analysis....
forces.

The respondents in the petition are: Federation of Pakistain through secretary interior; defence secretary; information secretary; chief secretary and home secretary of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa.

The petitioners claimed that the Washington Post on Oct 4, 2008, had reported that there was a secret deal between Pakistain and US governments allowing drone attacks.
Posted by:Fred

#3  BTW: I seem to recall posting here in 2003, viz reasons why Bush was myopic in doubting that Pakistan would ever abandon its "Pakistan in depth" policy, which included permanent support for Taleban.

and I picked the last five Superbowl winners, anonymously. Trust me on that. Like you
Posted by: Frank G   2011-11-06 17:39  

#2  If you believe Bruce Reidel there is no agreement. Hot pursuit against illegal harborage founds the motivation.

BTW: I seem to recall posting here in 2003, viz reasons why Bush was myopic in doubting that Pakistan would ever abandon its "Pakistan in depth" policy, which included permanent support for Taleban. Bush was a Saint then.
Posted by: Knuckles Whomoper5851   2011-11-06 17:15  

#1  I'd say the drone attacks are working if Pakistain is protesting.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-11-06 13:45  

00:00