You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Supreme Court will hear health care case this term
2011-11-14

In a case that could rival the historic Bush v. Gore ruling in shaking the political landscape, the Supreme Court said Monday it will hear arguments next March over President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.

The decision to hear arguments in the spring allows plenty of time for a decision in late June, just over four months before Election Day. This sets up an election-year showdown over the White House's main domestic policy achievement.

The justices announced they will hear more than five hours of arguments from lawyers on the constitutionality of a provision at the heart of the law, the requirement that individuals buy health insurance starting in 2014 or pay a penalty, and other related questions about the act.

Republicans have called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act unconstitutional since before Obama signed it into law in March 2010. But federal appeals courts have been split on their assessment.

The high court's 5-4 decision in the Bush v. Gore case nearly 11 years ago effectively sealed George W. Bush's 2000 presidential election victory.
I wonder if Kagan will recuse herslf? Yeah right....
Posted by:Beavis

#4  recusing is an ethical act. Don't expect Kevin James Elena Kagan to do that
Posted by: Frank G   2011-11-14 19:33  

#3  That's right. Kagan was *directly* involved. Thomas was never directly involved.

If we are going to look at friends and relatives of the justices - we may as well have them all recluse themselves....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2011-11-14 17:12  

#2  I don't see the same argument for recusing Clarence Thomas as I do for Kagan. The Donks think Thomas should recuse himself because his wife worked for an oranization which opposed national healthcare. Kagan was more directly involved in the process. She worked for the Obama administration as solicitor general on healthcare.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-11-14 16:02  

#1  Kagan has been asked to recuse herself. Don't know if she will.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2011-11-14 15:46  

00:00