You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
N. Korea Threatens Strike on South's Presidency
2011-11-25
[An Nahar] North Korea threatened Thursday to turn South Korea's presidential palace into a "sea of fire" in response to any provocation, a day after Seoul's military held a big exercise near the border.

The land, sea and air drill was staged to mark the first anniversary of a deadly North Korean attack on the South's border island of Yeonpyeong, which sparked outrage among South Koreans and prompted international alarm.

Pyongyang has always justified its bombardment on November 23, 2010 as a response to a South Korean artillery drill on Yeonpyeong, which it said dropped shells into the North's territorial waters.

The North's military Supreme Command said Thursday the South should not forget the lesson of the Yeonpyeong attack.

It described Wednesday's anniversary drill as "little short of a new political and military provocation".

If the South dared in future to "fire one bullet or shell" towards the North's territorial waters, air space and land, a "sea of fire" would engulf Seoul's presidential palace.

The North's armed forces "are in full readiness to go into a decisive battle to counter any military provocation", said the Supreme Command statement on Pyongyang's official news agency.

Last year's shelling killed two Marines and two civilians and damaged scores of buildings. It was the first attack on a civilian-populated area since the 1950-1953 war and caused fury in the South.

Seoul's military faced severe criticism for its perceived slow and weak response and Wednesday's drill was intended to simulate a tougher response -- including air strikes -- to any new attack.

South Korea has significantly strengthened troop levels and weaponry -- including multiple rocket launchers and Cobra attack helicopters -- on Yeonpyeong and other frontline islands in the past year.

The North's statement "is meant as a strongly worded warning in that it threatened a sea of fire against the (presidential) Blue House," Yang Moo-Jin of Seoul's University of North Korean Studies, told Agence La Belle France Presse.

"However,
man does not live by words alone, despite the fact that sometimes he has to eat them...
it does not foreshadow any military action."

Last year's island bombardment came eight months after the sinking of a South Korean warship with the loss of 46 lives. The North denies the South's claim that it torpedoed the corvette.

Cross-border tensions have eased somewhat this year. But Seoul insists Pyongyang admit responsibility for both incidents before there can be any substantial dialogue, a demand restated Wednesday by President Lee Myung-Bak.

Seoul and U.S. officials said the 2010 bombardment was probably ordered to burnish the military credentials of Kim Jong-Un, youngest son and heir apparent of Kim Dear Leader Jong-Il
... hereditary dictator of North Korea. His definition of reunification isn't the same as the definition in Seoul...
.

The North has this year made an international appeal for food aid and restated its willingness to return to nuclear disarmament talks.

U.N. officials say a quarter of the North's people urgently need food aid while Seoul officials say the situation is no worse than normal.

They suspect its neighbour wants to stockpile supplies before next year's 100th anniversary of the birth of founder Kim Il-Sung. The North customarily doles out extra food to its people on major anniversaries.

The United States and its allies say the North must take steps to show its sincerity before disarmament talks can resume.

Posted by:Fred

#8  More ...

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > CHINA DEFENDS AGZ [US] ENCIRCLEMENT.

* PAKISTAN DEFENCE FORUM > VIETNAM GOING NUCLEAR.

* INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > SOUTH CHINA SEA CONFLICT [ + instability in Korean Peninsula]COULD HAVE GLOBAL FALLOUT: INDIAN NAVY.

* SAME > US NAVAL MOVE IN AUSTRALIA MAY HELP INDIA TAKE ON CHINA. INdian Navy CHief ADM. Nirmal Verma.

* SAME > [10/2010 = reprint] US BUILDING UP DEFENSES FOR ITS MILITARY BASES NEAR CHINA, THREE US ANTI-MISSLE NETWORKS TO BE BUILT + CENTERED ON GUAM TO CHALLENGE/OPPOSE CHINA'S INTERESTS IN SPACE.

* DEFENCE FORUM INDIA > WHY WASHINGTON WANTS AN AUSTRALIAN BASE?

* SAME > [AllGov] US SHIFTING MILITARY FORCES CLOSER TO CHINA.

* SAME > AUSTRALIA TELLS CHINA NOT TO INTERFERE, in USMC training deal wid US + potential sale of AUS uranium to India.

* SAME > US NAVY'S NEXT STEP WILL PUT CHINA ON EDGE. Basing of USN Warships at Changi NB, Singapore.

* same > THE PHILIPPINES: AN ADOIT NON-ENTITY. Despite its seeming lack of military strength, the PHIL as one of Asia's weakest military powers or non-power is becoming increasingly assertive pr aggressive diplomatically due its receipt of support ala the USA, espec as per the on-going South China Sea sovereignty disputes vee China.

* WORLD MILITARY FORUM > CHINA MULLS WITHHOLDING GRANT OF RECOGNITION TO JAPANESE CLAIMS OF ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE DAOYUS [Japan = Senkakus] FOR 50 YEARS IN EXCHANGE FOR PERMANENT RESOURCE-SHARING, BASE RIGHTS AGREEMENTS.

* SAME > GROUP OF FIVE LARGE US MILITARY BASES IN PACIFIC FORM ANTI/COUNTER-CHINA "TRIPLE ISLAND CHAIN" TO CRUSH CHINA'S INTERESTS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-11-25 23:15  

#7  ION VARIOUS ...

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > CHINESE MILITARY USE WA STATION [West Australia = Mingenew] TO SPY ON WARSHIPS [AUS + USN]??? Using OZ's own space tracking station to recce the OZ + US Navies in the region.

* SAME > CHINA ANNOUNCES NAVAL DRILLS IN WESTERN PACIFIC, in response to US-AUS deal to allow training in Oz.

* SAME > CHINA EXPANDS AIR BASE ON COCO ISLAND [Bay of Bengal].

* SAME > MANHOMMAN SINGH TO CHINA'S WEN JIABAO: BACK OFF ON SOUTH CHINA SEA | INDIA WILL EXPPLORE FOR OIL [Oil-Gas = Energy, other Resources] IN SOUTH CHINA SEA: PM SINGH TO WEN JIABAO | INDIA REJECTS CHINESE OBJECTIOSN TO SOUTH CHINA SEAS EXPLORATION.

* SAME > [Vietnam] PRSIDENT: VIETNAM SHOULD HAVE USA AS A STRATEGIC PARTNER.

* BHARAT RAKSHAK > SOUTHEAST ASIA: US COMPLETING "ASIAN NATO" TO CONFRONT [isolate] CHINA.

* DEFENCE FORUM INDIA > [Video] CHINA TO [covertly] ATTACK INDIA TRADE SHIPS?, vee disguised fishing + hydrological research vessels [raiders]???

E.g. WW2 = "Q" SHIPS + similar.

* WORLD MILITARY FORUM > JAPAN DAILY NEWS: US FORCES ON OKINAWA TO WITHDRAW TO GUAM ISLAND FOR FEAR OF PLA AIR + MISSLE STRIKES, USA TO HOLD BACK AIR FORCE COMBAT ASSETS FROM GUAM + [perhaps] EVEN HAWAII UNTIL PLA THREAT IS GONE.

* TOPIX > MANILA ASKS SEOUL FOR MILITARY HELP [modern equipment, milsys].

* SAME > US ASSURES MANILA OF SECOND WARSHIP AMIDST SPRATLYS ROW.

* SAME > CHINA WARNS INDIA: FOREIGN COMPANIES KEEP AWAY FROM SOUTH CHINA SEA.

* INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > CHINA ACCELERATES FILLING STRATEGIC OIL/PRETROLEUM RESERVES [ expands capacity from 30-days only to 100+ days contingency].

* CHINA DAILY FORUM > KENYAN CHAP OBAMA THREATENS CHINA WID PUNITIVE ECONOMIC STEPS | [Russia Today] US-VS-CHINA: WHO RULES?

* SAME > [Russia Today] US IS A DECLINING POWER + HAS TROUBLE ADJUSTING. APEC reveals sharp divisions between the US + China.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-11-25 22:50  

#6  FREEREPUBLIC > NORTH KOREA: NK RUNNING "BACKPACK BOMB" UNIT [Backpack nuke or Radiation Bomb?).

FREEP POSTER = argued that its quite possible that the DPRK may also had successfully refurbished Soviet era "suitcase nukes".

AGain, IMO its likely in vassal North Korea's interests to NOT appear as "too successful" in Beijing's eyes as per indigenous development of advanced mil, nuke techs.

-----------

* ION TOPIX > VIETNAM PM CLAIMS CHINA USED FORCES TO OCCUPY ISLANDS [Paracels = Xishas back in 1974].

Essentially, the Viet PM is reasserting Vietnam's claims of sovereignty to the Paracels [Xishas] + Spratlys [Nanshas].

* INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > JAPAN TO CHALLENGE CHINA subtly = diplomatically] ON REGIONAL SECURITY.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-11-25 21:33  

#5  As per the MSM-Net, IIRC the majority of surveyed/polled South Koreans believe that CHINA will be the biggest obstacle to any DPRK-ROK effort at closer integration + ultimately national reunification.

China may not care iff the DPRK-ROK shoot at each other in casualty-causing border Arty duels, naval incidents, or even in major conventional war as long as the US + ROK + UNCOM [Taiwan? espec Japan?], etc. stay below the inter-Korean DMZ + not attempt to overthrow or destroy Kimmie + Regime in Pyongyang.

UNFORTUNATELY FOR KIMMIE, THE ABOVE HELPS PRESERVE HIS POWER + "DYNASTY" BUT DOES LITTLE OR NOTHING TO STOP HIS PEOPLE FROM STARVING.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-11-25 19:21  

#4  What's with them and this "sea of fire" thing?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-11-25 16:17  

#3  Would they do that if BHO wasn't in the White House?

Yeah, they would.
Posted by: Pappy   2011-11-25 15:38  

#2  My first thought on reading this was that Norks would seal their doom by turning the South into a "sea of fire." But then, Shomonter Crasing4122 brought me back to reality.
Posted by: JohnQC   2011-11-25 10:40  

#1  Would they do that if BHO wasn't in the White House? Remember when Jimmah Carter threatened to cut off all aid to SK unless they dropped security measures, and embraced his "human rights" policies?
Posted by: Shomonter Crasing4122   2011-11-25 04:17  

00:00