You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
"Really easy" to close Strait of Hormuz: Iranian navy chief
2011-12-29
[Dawn] Iran would find it 'really easy' to close the world's most important oil transit channel, the Strait of Hormuz at the Gulf's entrance, but would not do so right now, Iran's navy chief said Wednesday.

"Shutting the strait for Iran's armed forces is really easy -- or as we say (in Iran) easier than drinking a glass of water," Admiral Habibollah Sayari said in an interview with Iran's Press TV.

"But today, we don't need (to shut) the strait because we have the Sea of Oman under control, and can control the transit," he said.

Sayari was speaking a day after Iran's vice president, Mohammad Reza Rahimi, threatened to close the strait if the West imposed more sanctions on Iran, and as Iran's navy held wargames in international waters to the east of the channel.

World prices climbed after Rahimi warned on Tuesday that "not a drop of oil will pass through the Strait of Hormuz" if the West broadened sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programme.

"The enemies will only drop their plots when we put them back in their place," the official news agency IRNA quoted Rahimi as saying.

New York-traded light sweet crude rose to $101.36 on the threat.

More than a third of the world's tanker-borne oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic chokepoint that links the Gulf -- and its petroleum-exporting states of Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Soddy Arabia and the United Arab Emirates -- to the Indian Ocean.

The United States maintains a navy presence in the Gulf in large part to ensure that passage for oil remains free.

But Sayari asserted that the Strait of Hormuz "is completely under the control of the Islamic Theocratic Republic of Iran." He said Iran's navy was constituted with the aim of being able to close the strait if necessary.

Sayari added that the navy maneuvers east of the strait were designed to show Gulf neighbours the power of Iran's military over the zone.

Ships and aircraft dropped mines in the sea Tuesday as part of the drill, and on Wednesday drones flew out over the Indian Ocean, according to a navy front man, Admiral Mahmoud Mousavi.

Iran has several times said it is ready to target the strait if it is attacked or economically strangled by Western sanctions over its nuclear program.

An Iranian politician's comments last week that the navy exercises would block the Strait of Hormuz briefly sent oil prices soaring before that was denied by the government.

While the foreign ministry said such drastic action was "not on the agenda," it reiterated Iran's threat of "reactions" if the current tensions with the West spilled over into open confrontation.

Tehran in September rejected a Washington call for a military hotline between the capitals to defuse any "miscalculations" that could occur between their navies in the Gulf.

In Washington, US State Department deputy front man Mark Toner dismissed the latest threat from Iran's vice president.

"I just think it's another attempt by them to distract attention from the real issue, which is their continued non-compliance with their international nuclear obligations," Toner told news hounds.

The United States accuses Iran of using its uranium enrichment programme to build nuclear weapons. Iran denies the charges.

Extra US and European sanctions aimed at Iran's oil and financial sectors are being considered.

The last round of Western sanctions, announced in November, triggered a pro-regime protest in front of the British embassy in Tehran during which militia members answering to the Revolutionary Guards overran the mission, ransacking it.

London closed the embassy as a result and ordered Iran's mission in Britannia shut as well.
Posted by:Fred

#18  Back when we had adults running the country there was this little Navy exercise called 'Operation Earnest Will' that had surface combantants escorting tankers while Tomcats and Intruders, and Corsairs provided air cover and tanking support. Sadly, the adults, the F-14s, A-7s and Skypigs have all retired and what is left is a mere shadow. Lawn Darts don't have the legs and the Waffler-in-Chief ain't got the balls.....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2011-12-29 22:19  

#17  Of course no one has explain American election process to these clowns that the Blamer-in-Chief might just be looking for another non-Congressionally mandated war to shore up his dying political future, a desperate man grasping at straws.
Posted by: P2Kontheroad   2011-12-29 19:58  

#16  I think the Iranian navy chief has a valid point. Iran could lay mines.

Whether or not those mines will remain in the straits for a significant period of time is another story. Hydrographic data indicates otherwise (unless they deploy bottom mines - and that is still questionable).

Let [the Europeans]clear the straights and keep themselves from imploding.

The Germans still have an excellent mine clearing capacity. The USN, however, is essentially the only one with with mine countermeasure assets currently in-theater. Unfortunately it's not only the Europeans that would be impacted. The Japanese import 40% of their oil from the region; other Asian countries import as well, though to lesser amount. The short-term economic and political damage would be world-wide. An already-fragile economic situation will likely exacerbate matters, likely making any sort of damage control much harder, if near-impossible.
Posted by: Pappy   2011-12-29 18:15  

#15  Why? Let them clear the straights and keep themselves from imploding.

Because if they implode they will align openly with Iran, provide significant tech transfer to the Mullahs (and thereby to Hezb'allah and Hamas and Chavez etc.) and generally f&ck things up.
Posted by: lotp   2011-12-29 16:58  

#14  The question is, what would be Iran's long term goal from such a scenario?

To force the 12th Imam and Allah himself to involve themselves on the side of their people. These people are not sane as we define it, though some of the citizenry may be.
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-12-29 15:43  

#13  They could do it really easily for a few days to a week. Then enough military assets would be in place to pound their coast back to the stone age and keep them from firing missiles.

The question is, what would be Iran's long term goal from such a scenario?
Posted by: DarthVader   2011-12-29 12:38  

#12  nd figure out how to keep the Europeans from imploding while that happens.


Why? Let them clear the straights and keep themselves from imploding.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2011-12-29 12:32  

#11  Pull our finger.
Posted by: newc   2011-12-29 12:14  

#10  Bring it on sucker and we'll fly a cruise missile up your butt.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2011-12-29 11:54  

#9  Assuming, of course, that Iranian mines can tell the difference between Chinese and European tankers.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2011-12-29 11:00  

#8  The most effective strategy, if we could pull it off, would be to call their bluff.

Let them mine the Straits. And in response, announce a massive new investment in exploiting US energy sources, build the damned pipeline for Canadia shale oil and figure out how to keep the Europeans from imploding while that happens.

China would no doubt use that to build closer ties to Iran, but they'll do that anyway.
Posted by: lotp   2011-12-29 10:54  

#7  Sure, easy to do. But for how long and at what cost?
Posted by: SteveS   2011-12-29 10:45  

#6  -- Yes, it's very easy to close the Strait.
-- Yes, the economic damage to the rest of the world would be huge.
This has been true for only about say, 30 years.
The real questions are, what will the rest of the world do about it, and how much of the Mullocracy will remain intact after the Mullahs close the strait?
Iran is like a target in the largest artillery range ever made.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-12-29 09:01  

#5  I think the Iranian navy chief has a valid point. Iran could lay mines. Very cheap to make and lay. Quite effective too. It could be days to months until a lane could be made where ships could travel. It would be expensive to remove and the economic costs would be huge.
Posted by: BernardZ   2011-12-29 07:27  

#4  Welcome to Sderot.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-12-29 05:19  

#3  Tehran in September rejected a Washington call for a military hotline between the capitals to defuse any "miscalculations" that could occur between their navies in the Gulf.

I suppose Obamanure imagines that this is as bad as the Cold War?
Posted by: gorb   2011-12-29 04:07  

#2  I am sure that we know where all of their naval bases are. And all of their command and control sites. And all of their refineries. And lots of other things that they wouldn't like to lose.
Just sayin', is all.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2011-12-29 02:29  

#1  "Really easy" to close Strait of Hormuz: Iranian navy chief

With sunken Iranian warships preferably.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2011-12-29 01:15  

00:00