You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Virginia lawmaker: Children with disabilities are God's punishment for abortion
2012-01-18
"The number of children who are born subsequent to a first abortion with handicaps has increased dramatically. Why? Because when you abort the first born of any, nature takes its vengeance on the subsequent children," said Marshall, a Republican.

"In the Old Testament, the first born of every being, animal and man, was dedicated to the Lord. There's a special punishment Christians would suggest."
[I wouldn't normally crosspost from a cesspool like Think Progress, but the News Leader has taken the original article down.] I think it would be prudent for those of you reading this who are Virginia voters to make certain that a) This man is NOT the Republican candidate for the US Senate seat being vacated by Jim Webb (he's going to try), b) make sure that he has a credible, vigorous primary opponent from the 13th House of Delegates district next election cycle, and c) vote for whomever runs against him in either general election should he slip through somehow, even if you are a Republican.

Speaking as a Republican, he has no place in the party, and we should work energetically to remove him from our ranks. Delegate Marshall: step down and let the governor appoint a better man or woman to your seat. Then try reading the New Testament for a change. God doesn't punish children for the behavior of their parents. Nature doesn't "take its vengeance on the subsequent children." Period. That is NOT a pro-life position, or a mainstream Christian position. To the best of my knowledge it's not a Jewish or Islamic position, either. It's simply ignorant. My only child has Down syndrome, and she is not a "punishment" on her mother or me. Ridiculous: that's an anti-child, anti-family, and irreligious position.

As for those of us who AREN'T Virginians... well, there's no law against giving money to his opponents in both the primary and general election, now is there?

He does sound like a wingnut, doesn't he...
Posted by:Secret Master

#12  The link is to an article from 2010

Good catch, mom. Anonymoose, thank you for clarifying the medical facts for us. I've no doubt that some us will have the opportunity at some point to quote them to bring comfort.
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-01-18 22:50  

#11  In all fairness, reproduction is very hard, and it's almost miraculous that it happens at all, given the multitude of reasons why it shouldn't.

Even after going through the obstacle course to achieve pregnancy, 1 in 4 fetuses will be miscarried, with the greatest risk for the first child. There are strong suggestions that many women need to have a "test run" pregnancy before they can have a successful one.

This imbeciles theory is also awful from a medical standpoint, as though in an abortion, a woman may be so damaged that she can never again bring a baby to full term, it's an "either-or" situation. If she can, her baby is statistically the same for any given problem as is a baby of a woman who has not had an abortion.

So he is just being mean and cruel.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2012-01-18 17:42  

#10  Marshall's a little nuts.

OK, I guess, for the General Assembly since he's got an R after his name (thank god he's not from MY district) and can't do too much damage, but there's no way in HELL he should be in Congress.

George Allen is running - already got the ads out showing Tim Kaine (D-Bambi) is a butt-buddy of Obama. Unless someone better shows up, he has my support and what little money I can spare.
Posted by: Barbara   2012-01-18 14:48  

#9  The link is to an article from 2010. This explains why the original news item isn't up. I didn't realize that when I looked at this gentleman's website last night. I just skimmed his website for press releases on the subject, and didn't find anything specific. I haven't waded through the rest of his stuff.

As the mother of three young adults with Aspergers, living in Berkeley-on-the-lake, I have gotten the "You mean you didn't get genetic screening?" (as if there were a magic test for everything) from assorted lefties who maintain that I have somehow injured Gaia by having more than one kid, never mind kids who take a little longer to learn things. To have something equally callous and judgmental from someone who claims to be pro-life is outrageous.

BP, any braying jackass can say something stupid about God's judgement. For Jesus' view of the matter, see John Chapter 9: "Teacher, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" Jesus answered, "It was not for any one's sin, but that the glory of God might be revealed in him."

Posted by: mom   2012-01-18 13:36  

#8  It's strange that people will find this view (which I laugh at in it's ignorance) offensive, and yet will give a shrug to an ideology that has murdered 150+ Million.
You can't fight human nature. Abuse of animals is more newsworthy than abuse of children.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2012-01-18 12:29  

#7  God is just so why would God punish children for their parent' sin? This is horsehockey.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2012-01-18 12:10  

#6  Otherwise you chalk it up to damage to the Uterus

Bingo.
Posted by: lotp   2012-01-18 11:31  

#5  Rather makes the case for a god unworthy of worship IMHO.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2012-01-18 11:11  

#4  It makes a certain sense, if you're a loon.
Otherwise you chalk it up to Damage to the Uterus.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2012-01-18 10:20  

#3  Just as outrageous as thinking that Marxism will cause anything but shortages.

It's strange that people will find this view (which I laugh at in it's ignorance) offensive, and yet will give a shrug to an ideology that has murdered 150+ Million.

Zero tolerance for Marxists.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2012-01-18 07:21  

#2  effer!
Posted by: texhooey   2012-01-18 01:31  

#1  That's quite off the wall, and a Cruel thing to say.

All Children are gifts, and that probably needs to be expressed more now days.
Posted by: newc   2012-01-18 00:17  

00:00