You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX) Pushes Ahead on the XL Pipeline
2012-01-24
He has introduced a bill that would have Congress authorize the pipeline, which President Obama has scuttled to appease his base:

Tuesday, the Texas congressman introduced the “Keystone For A Secure Tomorrow Act” (K-FAST) to allow the 112th Congress to “directly and immediately” approve the Keystone XL Pipeline permit for TransCanada Corporation.

According to Poe, the approval of the pipeline is within Congress’ authority. In 1973, Poe noted, Congress passed the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act to allow construction of the 800-mile-long north–south pipeline from frozen Prudhoe Bay to the ice-free port of Valdez.

The Keystone XL project, if authorized, would start in Canada and end up in Port Arthur, TX — part of Poe’s district. Poe estimates that he represents more refineries than any other representative in Congress.

“My bill would authorize the construction of the pipeline — except for the new route that has not been determined yet, that small route in Nebraska, that would still have to go through the normal channels. The rest of it would be authorized immediately,” Poe told The Daily Caller, adding that since Keystone is in “the national interest” Congress has the authority to pass the legislation.

PoeÂ’s bill adds to proposals from other Republicans attempting to get around the Obama administrationÂ’s permit denial.
Posted by:DarthVader

#5  FOX FIVE AM Segment > Panel Member argued that, thanx to the Bammer's veto of the Keystone XL Pipeline, any oil would now have to be TRUCKED IN, ULTIMAT RAISING THE PRICE AT THE PUMP [Regular Unleaded] BY AN ESTIM US$0.30 Cents.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-01-24 22:34  

#4  If the pipeline is built piece-meal, state government should be able to approve each separate section. The pipeline is necessary for North Dakota crude regardless of whether the cross-border hook-up is ever made. The State Department has over site only of the crossing. Certainly foreign companies are free to conduct business within the United States. If the State Department is approving every new Honda dealership that is news to me.
Posted by: Super Hose   2012-01-24 22:19  

#3  This puts the Democrats squarely in the cross hairs.
Posted by: Tamir Pardo   2012-01-24 19:42  

#2  Hero.
Posted by: Iblis   2012-01-24 19:04  

#1  Will it do any good, so long as the Democrats still hold a majority in the Senate?
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-01-24 18:42  

00:00