You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
US Ambassador: 'Intervention not an option in Syria'
2012-02-11
After the US closed its embassy in Damascus this week, US Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford gave his first foreign interview since leaving Syria to FRANCE 24 on Saturday. He called for an end to the violence and for Bashar al-Assad to step down.

In an interview with FRANCE 24, the US ambassador to Syria has defended his country's stance towards President Bashar al-Assad and called on the Syrian leader to end his brutal crackdown.

Robert Ford was pulled out of Syria earlier this week after the US closed the embassy because of security concerns.

In his first foreign interview since leaving the country, Ford told FRANCE 24's Arabic channel the US were still seeking a "peaceful political" solution. Ford said military intervention was not an option and denied suggestions that his country's refusal to step in was encouraging Assad to increase the violence.

"We are not dithering. We are not hesitating. The US position is that we reject any kind of military intervention in Syria, let's be clear about that," Ford told FRANCE 24. "We are striving for a peaceful political solution. Even the Syrian people do not want a military solution to this crisis.

"We believe Assad should step down, but at the end of the day the Syrian people will make the decision, not the US," he said.
Posted by:tipper

#4  Is it possible we're starting to understand that change, especially in Arab governments, is not necessarily an improvement? Are we better off with Mubarak gone? With Saleh going? Bin Ali gone? Even Daffy & Saddam may turn out to have been the lesser of evils - only time will tell.
Posted by: Glenmore   2012-02-11 16:44  

#3  So much for the often touted concept of "reponsibliity to protect" -perhaps its responsibility to protect the oil (likely a more accurate doctrine). No that I advocate western interference in this -Let the Arabs "protect" lets see how much thanks they get.
Posted by: Northern Cousin   2012-02-11 16:36  

#2  They don't have any oil, and their flood of refugees will end up in Lebanon and Turkey, no threat to Europe.
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-02-11 16:10  

#1  They don't have any oil. They're not worth it.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2012-02-11 15:25  

00:00