| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| Burning Russian Sub Had 16 ICBMs Aboard |
| 2012-02-15 |
| Posted by:Grunter |
| #13 There was a fire. Thing didn't blow up. Sounds positive to me. Problem with the Russky PAO is getting the story straight, if not truthful. Hate to be a PAO in anybody's military, but especially not theirs. |
| Posted by: Richard Aubrey 2012-02-15 22:46 |
| #12 His assets got frozen? |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2012-02-15 17:46 |
| #11 ah yes. wouldn't! |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2012-02-15 17:12 |
| #10 @mojo he slid all the way to the mechanic? |
| Posted by: Kojack 2012-02-15 16:48 |
| #9 Andrei, you've lost another submarine? |
| Posted by: European Conservative 2012-02-15 14:51 |
| #8 Sounded to me like people were more concerned that if it burned and the explosives from the torpedoes went off, there could have been a lot of fallout from the ICBMs. Aka, dirty bomb. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2012-02-15 11:55 |
| #7 Go to your room. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2012-02-15 11:35 |
| #6 Didja hear the one about the Eskimo with the ICBM? |
| Posted by: mojo 2012-02-15 11:05 |
| #5 BP, I assume you meant wouldn't go anywhere near it. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2012-02-15 09:49 |
| #4 Interesting that they don't off load their ICBMs before going into drydock for upkeep. |
| Posted by: Penguin 2012-02-15 09:38 |
| #3 >More idiocy from Reuters, who likely thinks if the sub burned down, the nukes would go off. It is a russian sub. I would go anywhere near it. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2012-02-15 09:33 |
| #2 So? It's a freaking missile sub, what else would be on it? More idiocy from Reuters, who likely thinks if the sub burned down, the nukes would go off. |
| Posted by: gromky 2012-02-15 01:07 |
| #1 16 Nuke-armed SLBMS + the Sub's NucReax. NUKE TORPEDOES? MINES? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2012-02-15 00:13 |