| Submit your comments on this article |
| International-UN-NGOs |
| 56 Islamic States Reject UN Debate on Anti-Gay Violence |
| 2012-02-19 |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #22 So bed-room monitoring is a legitimate role of the state? If the denizens of that state believe it is and grant that role to the state. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2012-02-19 22:06 |
| #21 Ok tipper, you've shocked me. There is a WORD for that?! But then, probably thirty words for it in Arabic. Depending on the species. Rule 34: There are no exceptions... |
| Posted by: badanov 2012-02-19 18:35 |
| #20 Eskimos and snow. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2012-02-19 17:57 |
| #19 Ok tipper, you've shocked me. There is a WORD for that?! But then, probably thirty words for it in Arabic. Depending on the species. |
| Posted by: RandomJD 2012-02-19 17:22 |
| #18 The alliance between the left and the Islamofascists was always a tenuous one. Aside from "Death to America" they really have nothing in common. |
| Posted by: Iblis 2012-02-19 17:02 |
| #17 @ tipper (#8) so you're telling us that Mo'who had 12 wives, some as young as 10 years old, was actually gay? It would appear so according to the hadiths at the link I provided. Also he married Aisha when she was 6. He would perform frottage on her (placing his penis between her thighs and rubbing until he ejaculated) until she was nine then he commenced penetrative sex with her. |
| Posted by: tipper 2012-02-19 16:52 |
| #16 I think the difference between B.O. and Santorum hinges on the extent to which they believe the state may legitimately interfere with personal sexual preferences. Santorum may have his panties in a wad, but I don't hear him calling for MORE regulation. |
| Posted by: RandomJD 2012-02-19 16:33 |
| #15 "So bed-room monitoring is a legitimate role of the state?" Apparently Bambi thinks so, BP. :-( Not just Bambi; Santorum also has his panties in a wad... |
| Posted by: Steve White 2012-02-19 15:07 |
| #14 That's a keeper, BP. :-D |
| Posted by: Barbara 2012-02-19 14:37 |
| #13 He was tri-sexual. he'd try anything. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2012-02-19 14:25 |
| #12 @ tipper (#8) so you're telling us that Mo'who had 12 wives, some as young as 10 years old, was actually gay? |
| Posted by: Mikey Hunt 2012-02-19 14:23 |
| #11 "So bed-room monitoring is a legitimate role of the state?" Apparently Bambi thinks so, BP. :-( |
| Posted by: Barbara 2012-02-19 13:21 |
| #10 >Is such "sexual behaviour" a valid and fundamental human right. So bed-room monitoring is a legitimate role of the state? New one on me. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2012-02-19 13:18 |
| #9 Alright: Which of the 57 Islamic states accepted the anti-gay violence debate? I bet it was California... |
| Posted by: badanov 2012-02-19 13:08 |
| #8 Islam is a gynophobic religion. So what does that tell you about the men who subscribe to that faith? Not to mention that sexual abuse is rampant in madrassas. And of course Mohammed was not only gay, but he was a disgusting pervert |
| Posted by: tipper 2012-02-19 12:52 |
| #7 Er yes. Next idiotic question. The genius and tolerance of Libertarianism on display. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2012-02-19 12:51 |
| #6 gromky: Except in Saudi, where the rules are so strict that their young people can't date, much less get married. High unemployment as well. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2012-02-19 12:32 |
| #5 Yeah, well in that type of country if you're not married by 25, then you're gay or something else is wrong with you. |
| Posted by: gromky 2012-02-19 10:47 |
| #4 I have to give some kudos to the homosexuals living in some Muslim countries for having the guts to challenge the regime, but doing it smart enough to get away with it. For example, in Egypt, a whole group of homosexuals would rent a "party barge" that would float in the middle of the Nile. Then they would hold a party. When the police showed up in boats to bust the "homosexual party", they would see it coming from a long way away, destroy any evidence, and all deny that they were homosexuals and demand the police show evidence that they were. When the police would point out that the only obvious evidence was that they were all men, they would to the police, and later in court, loudly protest, that to have a mixed gender party, by Sharia law, is clearly *immoral*, and they would never do such a thing. Very crafty. And if found guilty by the Sharia court, while their punishment was not particularly great, they could then proclaim that both the police and the Sharia court were demanding illegal conduct between unmarried people of different genders. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2012-02-19 09:01 |
| #3 a few days ago Hillary made a statement against FGMutilation; if Hillary makes a statement against anti gay violence in UN context which makes it plain that it applies to the Islamic world, it should certainly raise our opinion of her a bit of course, shouldn't Obama be making these statements too and in the same context |
| Posted by: lord garth 2012-02-19 08:16 |
| #2 Er yes. Next idiotic question. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2012-02-19 08:07 |
| #1 I think they have some valid points Is such "sexual behaviour” a valid and fundamental human right. |
| Posted by: BernardZ 2012-02-19 07:08 |