You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghanistan wants answers on long-term US military bases
2012-04-01
KABUL: Afghanistan wants the United States to clearly spell out what sort of military presence it will leave behind once most of its combat troops leave by the end of 2014, a senior Afghan official said.
Not likely to be any. The Taliban will once again rule almost all your country, and you'll be hard-pressed to keep your families alive. Afghan opium and heroin will flood Russia. But you won't have any Americans on your land kicking down doors and looking at your wimmin, so you'll be happy. Right?
It is also pressing Washington in talks over future cooperation to detail to be more forthcoming on what will be on offer for Afghan forces as they ready to take over responsibility security in the country that is still at war.
Think you're ready. Go for it. Bye.
“These are issues that concern us. We want to know how many bases will be there, how many soldiers and what will be their mission. And what will we get from the United States for our security forces,” Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s chief spokesman Aimal Faizi told Reuters, without specifying what levels he thought would be appropriate.
Zero, zero, none, and nothing.
In negotiations for a Strategic Partnership Deal on long-term cooperation, one of the stumbling blocks is the US plan for a limited military presence to ensure members of al Qaeda and other militant groups do not find a sanctuary again.
But we can do that from orbit if necessary...
Countries such as Russia, China and Pakistan are wary of an indefinite US military presence in the region. Neighbouring Iran strongly opposes the plan.

“Ultimately, it is we who are responsible for our security. We are moving towards taking full control. If there will be foreign military, then it has to be put clearly in a future security document,” another senior Afghan official said.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  at least we have an environmentally safe weapons disposal area now....

Plus a great lab for testing autonomous killbots in the air and on land.
Posted by: SteveS   2012-04-01 21:10  

#9  As per FREEREPUBLIC, the CPUSA is suing the Democratic Party for ideo + agenda theft.

OOOOOOOO, you just know you'll need to bring extra extra Popcorn to the Ninth Court.

LOL.

As for AFGHANISTAN ...

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > REOPENING NATO SUPPLY ROUTES: US READY TO OFFER MORE COMPENSATION, + to pay more Taxes, to Islamabad.

ARTIC > US OFFICIAL [IIUC = paraph] = COST(S) QUESTIONS are beside the point because the Supply Routes thru Pakistan remain the most effective + cheapest for the US-NATO, ESPEC AS PER US-NATO SUPPORT + MAINTENANCE OF AGHANISTAN'S SECURITY.

versus

* SAME > CHINA AND PAKISTAN TO STAND BY EACH OTHER.

Gilani reiterates that "CHINA'S ENEMY IS PAKISTAN'S ENEMY".

* IIRC SAME > INDIA-PAKISTAN NUCLEAR EXCHANGE STILL POSSIBLE IFF PAKISTAN CONTINUES TO SUPPORT MILITANTS, i.e. MilTerr activities agz India.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-04-01 20:20  

#8  at least we have an environmentally safe weapons disposal area now....
Posted by: Frank G   2012-04-01 20:01  

#7  I vote for no bases after we leave, and we will just commute from Diego Garcia.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2012-04-01 19:35  

#6  Graveyard of Empires....but the other ones were at least aware when they left that it was a sucking sump of 9th century tribalism and a fetis swamp of Islamic lunacy. We on the other hand, will leave and continue to send these people money we borrow from the Chinese because we really are that stupid inside the beltway where our leaders exist in some kind of Twighlight Zone altered reality.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2012-04-01 12:16  

#5  Yeah, that sounds about right.
Posted by: tu3031   2012-04-01 11:39  

#4  translation: keep the troops, but send the cash. lots of cash.
and we probably will.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2012-04-01 11:31  

#3  "Ultimately, it is we who are responsible for our security.

Have at it you goat buggering SOB's!
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-04-01 08:12  

#2  Anybody know about a group of Federal government workers at all levels that believe in Nostradamus and are communists if not just brain dead and want to topple the country?
Posted by: Hupomons Sneating9582   2012-04-01 07:53  

#1  High price for what? Look Inside at home for the real answer!
Posted by: Shitch Glomonter3410   2012-04-01 07:51  

00:00