You have commented 338 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Second Anti-Muslim Class Run By Military Officials Revealed
2012-05-13
'Hamas, always the voice of sweet reason, has infiltrated the U.S. government and the rules of war no longer apply.'

A second anti-Islamic course being taught to U.S. military officers has been discovered following revelations that one class advocated 'total war' against Moslems.

Al Jizz obtained the material from a course taught on a military base in Virginia which imply that the Paleostinian terrorist group Hamas has infiltrated the U.S government at the highest levels.

The slides seemingly warn officers of a link between Moslem Civil Liberties Advocacy Organisation (CAIR), and other American Moslem groups, with Hamas.
Our military people need to know that, because it's true.
Both courses are voluntary and were put together by the same group, a nonprofit that offers classes and workshops to military and government officials.

The slides are apparently approved by two retired three-star generals and James Woolsey, a former CIS director.
One of the slides in the course, which was taught to senior military officers in north Virginia, says that the Geneva Conventions are 'no longer relevant' when fighting against Moslems, Al Jizz reported.

Hundreds of slides were sent to the news website by an unidentified soldier who said 'this bigoted conspiracy cabal is both disgusting and so deeply un-American.'
One soldier's opinion. Odd that he would send it to Al Jazeera instead of the New York Times, though...
The shocking slides are part of a course called 'Understanding the Threat to America', which was taught at Joint Forces Staff College by Army Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Dooley.

Dooley has since been suspended from the army but still works at the college.
...which may suggest that the Joint Forces do not disapprove of the work he's been doing...
The presentation - entitled 'So What Can We Do?' A Counter - Jihad Op Design Model - lists Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki as precedents which can be applied to 'Mecca and Medina's destruction.'

The presentation reads: 'Given the factual basis of what "Islamists" say they seek to impose on the world, the United States has come to accept that radical "true Islam" is both a political and military enemy to free people throughout the world.
Note the sarcasm quotes around true Islam, modified by the adjective radical and referring to Islamists rather than Muslims in the first clause of the sentence...
'It is therefore time for the United States to make our true intentions clear. This barbaric ideology will no longer be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its self destruction.'
And, in fact, some in the Islamist movement do seem to be changing, inasmuch as they've grasped that engaging in violence against the homelands of the unbelievers results in harm to the Ummah rather than the historic bounties of conquest, and therefore other pathways ought to be pursued.
The documents showed that both the anti-Islamic courses were prepared by the Strategic Engagement Group, Inc., according to Al Jizz.

The group formed in 2010 'for the purpose of exposing and defeating efforts to subvert the United States Constitution and subjugate the American People,' says the company's website.
That's the first sentence. The second paragraph has an interesting list of clients.
Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR's national communications director, told Al Jizz: 'The intention of these trainers is to demonise Islam and to marginalise American Moslems.'
He says things like that an awful lot.
The slides are apparently approved by two retired three-star generals and James Woolsey, a former CIS director.
Is that the same gentleman who used to be director of the CIA?
John Kirby, a front man for the Department of Defense, said: 'The material that was presented to us as a matter of concern by this young officer student certainly is not in keeping with our values - and more importantly, not even in keeping with the strategy as we see it in the "War on Terror".'
Posted by:

#5  teaching the truth about islam does not make a course ANTI-islam. The facts are what the facts are.
Posted by: Hellfish   2012-05-13 19:31  

#4  >says that the Geneva Conventions are 'no longer relevant' when fighting against Moslems

Well they are partly relevant, but not completely because the moslem terrorist groups do not follow them or wear identifiable marks.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2012-05-13 12:39  

#3  War Gaming is not "anti-islam". Its what military leaders do.

These flag officers are not helping much either.
Posted by: newc   2012-05-13 11:39  

#2  somehow the contents of this course need to be made public
Posted by: Glaitch Bucket5471   2012-05-13 09:54  

#1  The facts they present speak for themselves and require no commentary. I applaud these men of courage."

—Lieutenant General Jerry Boykin, U.S. Army (retired)


Good enough for me.
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-05-13 02:35  

00:00