You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
U.S. and NATO secure exit route from Afghanistan
2012-06-05
U.S. and NATO equipment will have a guaranteed route out of Afghanistan after an agreement with Central Asian countries allowing the alliance to completely cut out the shorter Pakistani access routes NATO has used for years.

In a Monday press conference in Brussels, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters that a deal had been struck between Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan to allow the alliance's equipment to be moved through their territories. A deal already set with Russia will allow the equipment to be moved directly though land into Europe, and to air bases to fly the U.S. equipment home.

Pentagon officials said talks with the Pakistanis on opening the ground routes through Pakistan to the southern port of Karachi are still ongoing, but have yet to produce an agreement to re-open the routes, known as Ground Lines of Communication or (GLOC).The NATO deal with the Central Asian countries seems to indicate a deal with Pakistan may not happen or will be indefinitely delayed. Talks between NATO and Pakistan have been ongoing for several weeks to reopen the lines closed since a November 2011, mistaken attack on Pakistani troops by NATO forces. The attack killed 24 Pakistani troops along the border with Afghanistan.

The NATO alliance in Afghanistan began using the northern distribution route almost immediately after Pakistan closed its borders to supplies coming in and equipment and material leaving Afghanistan.

The northern passageway costs considerably more, more than double what the United States and NATO had been paying Pakistan.
Cock-a-boodle-doo!
Costs for the Pakistani route ranges somewhere around $250 per truck while trucks passing through the northern route can cost upwards of $1,200 per truck. During the negotiations with Pakistan, U.S. and NATO officials said that Pakistan wanted to raise its transit rates to as much as $5,000 per truck, something the United States said it would not pay.

"These agreements will give us a range of new options and the robust and flexible transport network we need," said Rasmussen as he announced the new transport deal and said the deal would make "the use of the Russian transit arrangements even more effective."

NATO plans to remove its final combat troops at the end of 2014 and hand over full security responsibility to Afghanistan then. Afghanistan is set to have around 350,000 of its own security forces in place at that point with a still-to-be-determined number of U.S. and international forces left behind to train the Afghan forces.
Posted by:gorb

#6  DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > US APOLOGY NEEDED TO [Re-]OPEN NATO SUPPLY ROUTES OR CLOSE FOREVER: KHAR.

PAK FM Hina Rabbini Khar.

* SAME > PAKISTAN REPEATS DEMAND FOR SALALA APOLOGY FROM US TO REOPEN SUPPLY ROUTES.

* SAME > PAKISTAN AND US: ALLIES WIDOUT TRUST.

Best of so-called "Frenemies"???

* DAILY TIMES.PK > US APOLOGY A MUST FOR REOPENING SUPPLY LINES: FM.

Taken collectively, IMO the success or failure of these alternate routes thru these CAR States will depend on whether US-Iran major ground war can be perman avoided, as per Russia's threat to close down the NDN iff the US-Israel attack Iran.

As indic by ...

* TOPIX > [HuffPo] MJ ROSENBERG: OBAMA CAN WIN [Re-] ELECTION IFF ENDING TO IRAN WAR THREAT, vee mainstream US Voter = Political acceptance of the US allowing Iran limited uranium enrichment for purposes of civilian nuclear energy, + while also removing UN Sanctions on Iran. There will seemingly not only be peace between the US + Shia Iran [ + by extension wid US ally, Iran rival Sunni Saudi Arabia?], but the latter Shia Iran will also help significantly reduce high gas, fuel prices in CONUS ala the resumption of bilateral oil trade.

FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION REMAINS = CAN THE US-WEST TRUST THE POST-GWOT, POST-"ARAB/MUSLIM/ISLAMIC SPRING", MOSTLY PRO-ISLAMIST ARAB-MUSLIM WORLD TO UNILATERALLY KEEP DANGEROUS NUKE-WMDS MILTECHS OUT OF THE [asymmetric] HANDS OF PRO-ISLAMIST, PRO-VIOLENCE/JIHAD MILITANTS-TERRORISTS/NGOS + ALIGNED???

Iff the on-going failure of the Arab-Muslim World to set up desired, so-called OWG "Islamic/Muslim Union" or similar is any measure, UNFORTUNATELY THE ANSWER IS A RESOUNDING "NO".

At least for the current generations.

[KIDDIES OF THE APOCALYPSE, OWG, + CALIPHATE here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-06-05 23:19  

#5  I like Glenmore's solution.
Posted by: Water Modem   2012-06-05 22:55  

#4  The alternative is to use General Sherman's approach to getting his troops back from Atlanta...
Posted by: Glenmore   2012-06-05 12:35  

#3  the extra shipping costs should be offset by the cutoff of all aid to the Pak lying thieving bastids
Posted by: Frank G   2012-06-05 10:16  

#2  A deal already set with Russia will allow the equipment to be moved directly though land into Europe, and to air bases to fly the U.S. equipment home.

My cost ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-06-05 09:06  

#1  Alternative,load a truck with a small bomb and Smallpox and pass through, if it's hijacked wait a few days and resume shipments, they'll all be dead.

Yes I'm tired of this shit.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2012-06-05 09:02  

00:01