The US policy of using aerial drones to carry out assassinations presents a major challenge to the system of international law that has endured since the second world war, a United Nations...a formerly good idea gone bad...
investigator has said.
Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial killings, summary or arbitrary executions, told a conference in Geneva that President B.O.'s attacks in Pakistain, Yemen and elsewhere, carried out by the CIA, would encourage other states to flout long-established human rights
...which are usually open to widely divergent definitions...
standards.
In his strongest critique so far of drone strikes, Heyns suggested some may even constitute "war crimes". His comments come amid rising international unease over the surge in killings by remotely piloted unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
Addressing the conference, which was organised by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a second UN rapporteur, Ben Emmerson QC, who monitors counter-terrorism, announced he would be prioritising inquiries into drone strikes.
The London-based barrister said the issue was moving rapidly up the international agenda after China and Russia this week jointly issued a statement at the UN Human Rights Council, backed by other countries, condemning drone attacks.
If the US or any other states responsible for attacks outside recognised war zones did not establish independent investigations into each killing, Emmerson emphasised, then "the UN itself should consider establishing an investigatory body".
Also present was Pakistain's ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Zamir Akram, who called for international legal action to halt the "totally counterproductive attacks" by the US in his country.
Heyns, a South African law professor, told the meeting: "Are we to accept major changes to the international legal system which has been in existence since world war two and survived nuclear threats?"
Some states, he added, "find assassinations immensely attractive. Others may do so in future ... Current targeting practices weaken the rule of law. Killings may be lawful in an armed conflict [such as Afghanistan] but many assassinations take place far from areas where it's recognised as being an armed conflict."
