You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Footage of sailors held by pirates released
2012-07-11
[Dawn] While the latest footage purportedly showing seven Paks among 22 sailors held hostage by Somali pirates for ransom might have upset the families who have been waiting for their release for the past 18 months, the authorities engaged in the process of getting them released against ransom payment were on Monday confident about 'good news' within the next few days.

The footage relayed by the news channels purports to show crew members of the M.V. Albedo -- a Malaysian-flagged fat merchantman -- at Qazi's guesthouse an undisclosed location in the custody of armed Somali pirates. The seamen showed in the footage are visibly shaken and weak.

Ahmed Chinoy, the chief of the Citizens-Police Liaison Committee that has been instrumental in collecting 'donations' for 'ransom payment' and in contact with the pirates as well as the families of the hostages, see the footage as an attempt from the pirates to pressurise the people involved in the 'release process' to get their terms materialised.

"But we are moving fast and have made almost all arrangements at least at our end," he said. "We have collected $1.1 million for the ransom and as we are in contact with the pirates, the deadline for the payment is not an issue. But there are other anomalies that need to be addressed."

He explained that the government of Malaysia was in the process of completing legal and other formalities to get the ship owned by a Malaysian company released. He was optimistic that no more collection of funds would be needed once the Malaysian government was done with its job.

"I am very hopeful about good news within the next few days. Among 22 sailors, there are seven each from Pakistain and Bangladesh, six from Sri Lanka and one each from Iran and India. We have made tireless efforts to get the hostages freed regardless of what nationality they have," he added.

M.V. Albedo was sailing from the UAE to Kenya with all crew members on board in November 2010 when Somali pirates hijacked it.

The fat merchantman was hijacked only a few months after the Somali pirates had held 22 crew members, including four Paks, of M.V. Suez hostage in August 2010. It was only after the payment of $2.1 million ransom in June 2011 that they released the MV Suez crew comprising four Paks, six Indians, 11 Egyptians and one Sri Lankan.

With the incidents of piracy increasing, local and international authorities are under pressure to design a mechanism for the security of cargo ships, including the deployment of armed guards on vessels, but shippers argue that it would add to the risks to the business.

"Of the world's 53 hijackings of cargo ships for ransom last year, 49 took place off the coast of Somalia," said an official at the directorate ports and shipping. "A number of Pak seamen were among those taken hostage by Somali pirates with dozens of their foreign colleagues kept hostage for ransom by pirates for as long as a year."
Posted by:Fred

#6  There are options.

One is to jack the costs of insurance for ships transiting through areas of known piracy to beyond the point of pain. That is sort-of happening, but not to the point of forcing shippers, shipping companies and governments to take a more proactive (and preferably aggressive) stance.

Another is to enforce a convoy-only run through areas of known piracy. Anyone on their own voids their insurance. It'll be like herding cats - at first. But it will cut down on attacks.

Finally, deal with this as the international organized-crime operation that it is. That likely won't happen; there's too much money being spread around.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-07-11 18:16  

#5  Good point, Paps.
Posted by: American Delight   2012-07-11 17:25  

#4  So this is all about the costs of repairs, and payoffs from insurance.

It's more involved than that, as anyone with experience in maritime law can tell you.

Essentially, it's the gray area where a merchant vessel drifts into the 'warship' designation. The latter has international legal and political ramifications.

'Armed mechantman' is a completely different animal and is legally considered an auxiliary military asset of a government.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-07-11 15:33  

#3  Seems to me that if protecting your ship is important you'd want something like a PT boat aboard that could be dropped into the water and intercept anything that shows up on radar long before they got close. Couple of 50 calibres would do wonders to the kind of ship the pirates tend to use.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2012-07-11 14:46  

#2  Doesn't seem very smart for Malaysia to confirm that it's arranging a ransom payment. It will encourage further abductions of Malaysian-flagged ships and/or encourage shippers to register their vessels with countries other than Malaysia.
Posted by: American Delight   2012-07-11 13:40  

#1  How does putting armed guards on ships in the Gulf of Aden possibly increase the risks of the journey? They are already sailing thru pirate infested waters. Well armed/trained guards have got a good chance of stopping pirates dead in their tracks.

What these shipping owners are NOT saying is that they don't give a da** about their own crews. Since the crewmen are Filipinos and Pakistanis (etc.), they are basically considered expendable. The only thing the owners care about is that their ships are not damaged - which could happen in a firefight. So this is all about the costs of repairs, and payoffs from insurance.

Pretty da**ed sick.
Maybe someone should round up a bunch of these shipping owners, and trade them as a group to the pirates - in exchange for the men currently in captivity. Suddenly when the show is on the other foot, we might see a change in attitude.
Posted by: Raider   2012-07-11 10:08  

00:00