You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Gujrat attack
2012-07-12
[Dawn] MONDAY'S attack on soldiers in Gujrat was a stark reminder that home-grown Islamic fascisti still have the intention, and the means, to target security forces outside the tribal areas. The pace of such attacks has slowed down, and there have been no recent incidents on the scale of PNS Mehran or GHQ, so some progress against this threat has been made over the last couple of years. But the ease with which this most recent assault took place indicates that the danger persists and that the quality of preventive intelligence-gathering, and even of routine surveillance around a military presence, is still not where it needs to be.

Second, the incident was a reminder of the jihad boy nexus connecting settled areas to Fata-based militancy. It is not entirely clear whether the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistain, which has grabbed credit, was involved directly, or if the attack was carried out by Punjab-based Islamic fascisti affiliated with it. But it is plain that Punjab is still vulnerable to violent extremism and anti-state activity that is made possible by links that stretch from Fata to the province.

What remains missing is official messaging that can inform Paks about the real nature of this threat -- that it is home-grown and focused on the destruction of the Pak state as it exists today. The view that such attacks are carried out by foreign hands, for example, or that they are justified because of Pakistain's alliance with the United States, are alarmingly common. But each incident can also be used as an opportunity to fight these misperceptions. The concept of the so-called Punjabi Taliban still remains a murky one in terms of who is involved, who they are linked to, and what their aims are. And not all sensitive information about these groups can be shared publicly. But this is not a war that can be fought without citizens' support, and some amount of disclosure about how these groups are weakening Pakistain could help build a national consensus against militancy and improve intelligence-gathering by making citizens responsive to suspicious activity in their communities.
Posted by:Fred

00:00