You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Israeli court rejects activist's family's lawsuit
2012-08-28
An Israeli court on Monday rejected a lawsuit brought against the military by the parents of a U.S. activist crushed to death by an army bulldozer during a 2003 demonstration, ruling the army was not at fault for her death.

The bulldozer driver has said he didn't see 23-year-old Rachel Corrie, a pro-Palestinian activist, who was trying to block the vehicle's path during a demonstration in the Gaza Strip against the military's demolition of Palestinian homes. The military deemed her March 2003 death to be accidental, but Corrie's parents were not satisfied by the army investigation and filed a civil lawsuit two years later.

Explaining the district court's ruling, Judge Oded Gershon said Corrie "put herself in a dangerous situation" and called her death "the result of an accident she brought upon herself." He said the military conducted a proper investigation, and rejected the Corrie family's request for a symbolic $1 in damages and legal expenses.

Corrie's parents, Craig and Cindy Corrie of Olympia, Washington, did not speak immediately after the verdict, but clasped each other's hands.

Their lawyer, Hussein Abu Hussein, lamented the court's ruling, saying "the verdict blames the victim."

"While not surprising, this verdict is yet another example of where impunity has prevailed over accountability and fairness," he said. "Rachel Corrie was killed while non-violently protesting home demolitions and injustice in Gaza, and today, this court has given its stamp of approval to flawed and illegal practices that failed to protect civilian life."
Posted by:tipper

#7  In other news BigFoot's family to sue Highways agency
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2012-08-28 16:07  

#6  So the prosecutions case fell flat.

Oh, and its not symbolic, it was an attempt at precedence. Parent can go suck sap out of a tree for that, and not taking their own responsibility for loosing their daughter deemed fit and adult for this world, which this lawsuit, IMO, negates the cause of their own daughter by way of stating she was not responsible for her demise and so therefore her cause does not require or demand responsibility.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-08-28 14:15  

#5  she was a radical hate-filled b*tch IMHO. Look at the hate on her face as she burns an "American Flag". The mystified looks on the Paleo kids' faces is a lesson...
Posted by: Frank G   2012-08-28 10:29  

#4  "the verdict blames the victim."

The old lawyer dodge, make the perp the victim.

Human free will. If we don't have human free will, by rational extension there is no need for democracy, juries, or contracts.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-08-28 09:02  

#3  Only 23 years old, barely a woman. Excuse me, but I must ask, where were her parents ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-08-28 07:40  

#2  No snark here:

A tragedy and a waste of resources and a life, tragic on so many levels.

A young woman who should have been home being chased by men, or having her children, instead chose a life where her personality was subduced by a hostile political movement, which demanded she put her personal safety in danger so she can put on a show for the movement.

Rachel Corrie ought to be remembered as a stupid woman who made a stupid mistake which cost her her life.
Posted by: badanov   2012-08-28 06:58  

#1  Best snark competition?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2012-08-28 06:05  

00:00