You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Keystone Pipeline's Cowboys versus the ... Native Americans
2012-09-20
TransCanada's plan to dig a trench and bury part of its $7 billion, 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline right through this [Cushing, OK] land has unearthed a host of Native American opposition, resentments and ghosts of the past. Winning support in Indian country is one of the last hurdles for the project, which is touted as a key to North American energy security. The question is whether gaining tribal support is a courtesy, as the company puts it, or a legal obligation.
Later, we find the actual pipeline does not actually pass thru any actual tribal reservations, actually. HOWEVER...
But many Native Americans in the United States -- and their lawyers -- insist that there are legal obligations under 19th-century treaties that affirmed sovereign status of Native American tribes, which do not pay state or federal taxes and which have their own governing councils and police forces.

Moreover, the more recent National Historic Preservation Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 both provide for the protection of Indian burial sites and artifacts. "When it comes to jurisdiction, it's a tough question to answer," said Jennifer Baker, a Colorado-based lawyer who has worked closely with South Dakota tribes. "History has developed so that legal truths get overshadowed by factual realities, and judges tend to mold the law to reflect factual realities."
All environmental impact statements include a section on cultural resources, including the potential for archeological sites. I had to move a borrow pit once, to avoid a "potential" site.
"There is no legal obligation to work with the tribes," said Lou Thompson, TransCanada's top liaison with Native Americans. "We do it because we have a policy. We believe it's a good, neighborly thing to do." He said the pipeline "is not passing through any tribal lands."

TransCanada has flown some tribal leaders to Calgary to tour the company's operations center where banks of computers monitor thousands of points along existing pipelines. And it has trained members of the Alabama ­Coushatta tribe from south Texas to act as monitors during construction in case Indian remains or artifacts turn up on the tribe's stretch of the pipeline.
That's good enough for me.
"We walk the entire pipeline route and identify sites and alter the route of our pipeline to avoid those sites," said Thompson of TransCanada.
So this should be the end of the story, but there are three more pages.
He said that the company has also asked the tribes to conduct their own studies of sensitive sites. "Sometimes there are areas very significant to the tribes that don't bear any physical evidence," Thompson said. "It might be used to hold ceremonies, but if you walked there you wouldn't see any evidence."
And that's MORE than enough for me!
Posted by:Bobby

#7  We had a job in the Bering Sea area years ago. It was an archaeologists dream. Thousands of years of lots of artifacts. We had an archaeologist on staff for that job. Got an MOA and a monitoring plan and protocols with SHPO. So there we were, merrily digging a trench for a raw water pipeline and discovered an intact skeleton. Turns out this poor chap had 19 arrow heads in his body. Not a popular character, I would say.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2012-09-20 21:28  

#6  Bingo, EC.
Posted by: Barbara   2012-09-20 19:36  

#5  And almost all their OK burial sites...

You mean a voter rich environment for Democrats?
Posted by: European Conservative   2012-09-20 18:08  

#4  They can have Chicago.

Lord knows they can't do any worse than the current owners.
Posted by: DarthVader   2012-09-20 17:53  

#3  Ultimately, the tribe signed a series of treaties that pushed it to Illinois, then Iowa, then Kansas and finally in the 1870s to the Indian Territory...

Seems like they could lay claim to Chicago although I don't know why anyone would want it.
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-09-20 17:20  

#2  Yep. The "Indian Territory" - up until the Oklahoma Land Rush, that is.

My great grand-daddy staked a claim, and later bought another 1/4 section for $5 and a rifle.
Posted by: mojo   2012-09-20 16:49  

#1  I think most all the tribes in Oklahoma were moved there in the 1830's. Their archaological sites are back in TN etc. And almost all their OK burial sites are in the church cemeteries, same as everybody else.
Posted by: Glenmore   2012-09-20 13:49  

00:00